Thread: [cclib-devel] broken tests?

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

The testall.py script appears to be broken in trunk, revision 680. It  
complains about GaussianSPTest not having the _testMethodDoc  
attribute. Any idea what's causing this?

Adam

On Tuesday 10 July 2007 21:03, Adam Tenderholt wrote:
> The testall.py script appears to be broken in trunk, revision 680. It
> complains about GaussianSPTest not having the _testMethodDoc
> attribute. Any idea what's causing this?

It doesn't break on my system... what are you on? Could you copy the output? I 
did submit rev681 yesterday, but it didn't concern the tests (although try 
updating your trunk first).

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Wed Jul 11 08:42:26 EDT 2007

Works for me in Python2.5.

Fails for me in Python2.4 (with the same error as Adam found).

We are currently supporting both of these platforms so it's probably a
good idea to run all tests with Python2.4 in future.

Noel

On 11/07/07, Karol Langner <kar...@kn...> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 July 2007 21:03, Adam Tenderholt wrote:
> > The testall.py script appears to be broken in trunk, revision 680. It
> > complains about GaussianSPTest not having the _testMethodDoc
> > attribute. Any idea what's causing this?
>
> It doesn't break on my system... what are you on? Could you copy the output? I
> did submit rev681 yesterday, but it didn't concern the tests (although try
> updating your trunk first).
>
> --
> written by Karol Langner
> Wed Jul 11 08:42:26 EDT 2007
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> cclib-devel mailing list
> ccl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel
>

On Wednesday 11 July 2007 03:07, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
> Works for me in Python2.5.
>
> Fails for me in Python2.4 (with the same error as Adam found).
>
> We are currently supporting both of these platforms so it's probably a
> good idea to run all tests with Python2.4 in future.

Right... :) fixed.

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Wed Jul 11 11:08:10 EDT 2007