cclib-devel

[cclib-devel] Release of 0.7 final

[Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...>]

I plan to create a release of 0.7 final this evening. To be safe, I'm
going to apply the minimum number of patches:

r574, r575 which are basically documentation patches (but welcome all
the same :-) )

This release will be announced on the CCL, so we might even get some feedback.

Regards,
   Noel

Re: [cclib-devel] Release of 0.7 final

[Adam T. <a-t...@st...>]

You didn't want to wait until the ADF bugs were fixed?

Noel O'Boyle wrote:
> I plan to create a release of 0.7 final this evening. To be safe, I'm
> going to apply the minimum number of patches:
> 
> r574, r575 which are basically documentation patches (but welcome all
> the same :-) )
> 
> This release will be announced on the CCL, so we might even get some feedback.
> 
> Regards,
>    Noel
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> cclib-devel mailing list
> ccl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel

Re: [cclib-devel] Release of 0.7 final

[Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...>]

Well...in an ideal world yes, but my ideals are starting to become
more pragmatic :-) I have time tonight to get things done, which I
won't have for the next few days. Also, I think we should try and
stick to a reasonably timely release schedule even if it means that
particular bugs don't make it.

As ever if you feel strongly, I can work on those bugs tonight
instead...I will probably take a look in any case. Otherwise, we can
do a 0.71 release at a later date, which will just contain bug fixes -
at least this will allow us to start on the refactoring necessary for
0.8.

Regards,
   Noel

On 21/03/07, Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> wrote:
> You didn't want to wait until the ADF bugs were fixed?
>
> Noel O'Boyle wrote:
> > I plan to create a release of 0.7 final this evening. To be safe, I'm
> > going to apply the minimum number of patches:
> >
> > r574, r575 which are basically documentation patches (but welcome all
> > the same :-) )
> >
> > This release will be announced on the CCL, so we might even get some feedback.
> >
> > Regards,
> >    Noel
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > cclib-devel mailing list
> > ccl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel
>

Re: [cclib-devel] Release of 0.7 final

[Adam T. <a-t...@st...>]

> As ever if you feel strongly, I can work on those bugs tonight
> instead...I will probably take a look in any case. Otherwise, we can
> do a 0.71 release at a later date, which will just contain bug fixes -
> at least this will allow us to start on the refactoring necessary for
> 0.8.

I don't feel strongly about it. And now that I think about it, there  
are two (minor) problems with the ADF parser: we haven't added  
support for the 2006.01 version or spin-orbit calculations. Fixing  
the first is like adding support for a new parse, while fixing the  
second is like adding support for a completely different type of  
calculation (eg. mp energies). Both of which should be minor updates  
as they involve slight modifications to our current adf parser and  
can go in a 0.7.1 release.

Adam

Re: [cclib-devel] Release of 0.7 final

[Karol L. <kar...@kn...>]

On Wednesday 21 of March 2007 18:59, Adam Tenderholt wrote:
> > As ever if you feel strongly, I can work on those bugs tonight
> > instead...I will probably take a look in any case. Otherwise, we can
> > do a 0.71 release at a later date, which will just contain bug fixes -
> > at least this will allow us to start on the refactoring necessary for
> > 0.8.
>
> I don't feel strongly about it. And now that I think about it, there
> are two (minor) problems with the ADF parser: we haven't added
> support for the 2006.01 version or spin-orbit calculations. Fixing
> the first is like adding support for a new parse, while fixing the
> second is like adding support for a completely different type of
> calculation (eg. mp energies). Both of which should be minor updates
> as they involve slight modifications to our current adf parser and
> can go in a 0.7.1 release.
>
> Adam

I'm all for getting 0.7 out as soon as possible and later releasing 0.7.1 - 
that would probably make the fixes more solid. I'll be happy to help with the 
ADF parser, too, especially since I've been wanting to start using the 
program for a while now. In my case, I will have a some more time to spare 
for cclib after Friday.

Karol

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Wed Mar 21 23:02:32 CET 2007