Menu
▾
▴
cclib-devel
|
From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2011-04-12 09:03:31
|
Noel, While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael Bank. Is there any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? - Karol ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> ----- ... ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel should be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) ... ----- End forwarded message ----- -- written by Karol M. Langner Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 |
|
From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2011-04-12 09:26:14
|
All in favour say "aye". Aye. On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > Noel, > > While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael Bank. Is there > any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? > > - Karol > > ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> ----- > > ... > > ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to > relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel should > be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > ... > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > written by Karol M. Langner > Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > |
|
From: Adam T. <ate...@gm...> - 2011-04-12 22:57:07
|
Aye. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: >> Noel, >> >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael Bank. Is there >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? >> >> - Karol >> >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> ----- >> >> ... >> >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel should >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) >> >> ... >> >> ----- End forwarded message ----- >> >> -- >> written by Karol M. Langner >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > cclib-devel mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > |
|
From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2011-04-13 09:53:13
|
Aye. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > Aye. > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > >> Noel, > >> > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael Bank. Is there > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? > >> > >> - Karol > >> > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> ----- > >> > >> ... > >> > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel should > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > >> > >> ... > >> > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > >> > >> -- > >> written by Karol M. Langner > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > _______________________________________________ > > cclib-devel mailing list > > ccl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > -- written by Karol Langner Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 |
|
From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 11:31:22
|
Hi, Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should change it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the LICENSE file? - Karol On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > Aye. > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > Aye. > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > > >> Noel, > > >> > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael Bank. Is there > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? > > >> > > >> - Karol > > >> > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> ----- > > >> > > >> ... > > >> > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel should > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > >> > > >> ... > > >> > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > >> > > >> -- > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > _______________________________________________ > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > ccl...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 -- written by Karol Langner Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 |
|
From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 12:10:59
|
Both, I guess. On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should change > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the > LICENSE file? > > - Karol > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > Aye. > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > > Aye. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > wrote: > > > >> Noel, > > > >> > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael > Bank. Is there > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? > > > >> > > > >> - Karol > > > >> > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> > ----- > > > >> > > > >> ... > > > >> > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel > should > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > > >> > > > >> ... > > > >> > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and > minutes > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave > Report as > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service > providers. > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and > vision. > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > > ccl...@li... > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > > > > -- > > written by Karol Langner > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 > |
|
From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 14:18:01
|
Done. Please review. On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > Both, I guess. > > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should change > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the > > LICENSE file? > > > > - Karol > > > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > > Aye. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> > > wrote: > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > > wrote: > > > > >> Noel, > > > > >> > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael > > Bank. Is there > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? > > > > >> > > > > >> - Karol > > > > >> > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> > > ----- > > > > >> > > > > >> ... > > > > >> > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel > > should > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > > > >> > > > > >> ... > > > > >> > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and > > minutes > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave > > Report as > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service > > providers. > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and > > vision. > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > > > ccl...@li... > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > written by Karol Langner > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 > > > > -- > > written by Karol Langner > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 > > -- written by Karol Langner Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 |
|
From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 15:38:07
|
Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > Done. Please review. > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > Both, I guess. > > > > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should change > > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the > > > LICENSE file? > > > > > > - Karol > > > > > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle < > bao...@gm...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner < > kar...@gm...> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Noel, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from > Michael > > > Bank. Is there > > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or > later"? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - Karol > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> > > > ----- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ... > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors > to > > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel > > > should > > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ... > > > > > >> > > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours > and > > > minutes > > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave > > > Report as > > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service > > > providers. > > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services > and > > > vision. > > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > > > > ccl...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 > > > > > > -- > > > written by Karol Langner > > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 > > > > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 > |
|
From: Adam T. <ate...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 16:07:02
|
Thanks for taking care of this. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. > > > On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Done. Please review. >> >> On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: >> > Both, I guess. >> > >> > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should >> > > change >> > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the >> > > LICENSE file? >> > > >> > > - Karol >> > > >> > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: >> > > > Aye. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: >> > > > > Aye. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle >> > > > > <bao...@gm...> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner >> > > > > > <kar...@gm...> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> Noel, >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from >> > > > > >> Michael >> > > Bank. Is there >> > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or >> > > > > >> later"? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> - Karol >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> >> > > ----- >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ... >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors >> > > > > >> to >> > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run >> > > > > >> into >> > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel >> > > should >> > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ... >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> -- >> > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner >> > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours >> > > > > > and >> > > minutes >> > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave >> > > Report as >> > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service >> > > providers. >> > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services >> > > > > > and >> > > vision. >> > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list >> > > > > > ccl...@li... >> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > written by Karol Langner >> > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 >> > > >> > > -- >> > > written by Karol Langner >> > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 >> > > >> >> -- >> written by Karol Langner >> Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 > > |
|
From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 16:07:58
|
With? Version 3 of the LGPL? On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. > > On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > > > Done. Please review. > > > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > > Both, I guess. > > > > > > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should change > > > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the > > > > LICENSE file? > > > > > > > > - Karol > > > > > > > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle < > > bao...@gm...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner < > > kar...@gm...> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Noel, > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from > > Michael > > > > Bank. Is there > > > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or > > later"? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> - Karol > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> > > > > ----- > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ... > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors > > to > > > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into > > > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel > > > > should > > > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ... > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours > > and > > > > minutes > > > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave > > > > Report as > > > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service > > > > providers. > > > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services > > and > > > > vision. > > > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > > > > > ccl...@li... > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 > > > > > > > > -- > > written by Karol Langner > > Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 > > -- written by Karol Langner Thu Apr 19 18:06:53 CEST 2012 |
|
From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 16:11:10
|
Hmmm...I guess you're right - we should just leave it. It's clear from the source that a later version can be used instead. - Noel On 19 April 2012 17:07, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > With? Version 3 of the LGPL? > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. > > > > On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > > Done. Please review. > > > > > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > > > Both, I guess. > > > > > > > > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should > change > > > > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in > the > > > > > LICENSE file? > > > > > > > > > > - Karol > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle < > > > bao...@gm...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner < > > > kar...@gm...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Noel, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from > > > Michael > > > > > Bank. Is there > > > > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or > > > later"? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> - Karol > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck < > mb...@de...> > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ... > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream > authors > > > to > > > > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run > into > > > > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least > Noel > > > > > should > > > > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ... > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > > > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in > hours > > > and > > > > > minutes > > > > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester > Wave > > > > > Report as > > > > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service > > > > > providers. > > > > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of > services > > > and > > > > > vision. > > > > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > > > > > > ccl...@li... > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > written by Karol Langner > > > Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 > > > > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Thu Apr 19 18:06:53 CEST 2012 > |
|
From: Adam T. <ate...@gm...> - 2012-04-22 17:34:46
|
Any reason the copyright dates weren't updated to include 2012? On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > Hmmm...I guess you're right - we should just leave it. It's clear from the > source that a later version can be used instead. > > - Noel > > > On 19 April 2012 17:07, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: >> >> With? Version 3 of the LGPL? >> >> On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: >> > Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. >> > >> > On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Done. Please review. >> > > >> > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: >> > > > Both, I guess. >> > > > >> > > > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should >> > > > > change >> > > > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in >> > > > > the >> > > > > LICENSE file? >> > > > > >> > > > > - Karol >> > > > > >> > > > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: >> > > > > > Aye. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: >> > > > > > > Aye. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle < >> > > bao...@gm...> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner < >> > > kar...@gm...> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> Noel, >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from >> > > Michael >> > > > > Bank. Is there >> > > > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one >> > > > > > > >> "or >> > > later"? >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> - Karol >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck >> > > > > > > >> <mb...@de...> >> > > > > ----- >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> ... >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream >> > > > > > > >> authors >> > > to >> > > > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run >> > > > > > > >> into >> > > > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least >> > > > > > > >> Noel >> > > > > should >> > > > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> ... >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> -- >> > > > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner >> > > > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in >> > > > > > > > hours >> > > and >> > > > > minutes >> > > > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester >> > > > > > > > Wave >> > > > > Report as >> > > > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service >> > > > > providers. >> > > > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of >> > > > > > > > services >> > > and >> > > > > vision. >> > > > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list >> > > > > > > > ccl...@li... >> > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > written by Karol Langner >> > > > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > written by Karol Langner >> > > > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 >> > > > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > written by Karol Langner >> > > Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 >> > > >> >> -- >> written by Karol Langner >> Thu Apr 19 18:06:53 CEST 2012 > > |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X