Menu
▾
▴
cchatd-devel — cchatd - C-compiled Chat Deamon Developers List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(16) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-23 11:54:47
|
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:57:43PM -0300, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote: > > Of course it is possible, the point is when? We have time differences > here. Until next week I can be online to discuss this anytime of the day. > ;o) > > What about others? Maybe 25 May 13:00:00 UTC 2002 ? Whatever I'm on #cchatd (irc.openprojects.net) as [krzyzak]. Please meet me. -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2002-05-22 17:58:49
|
Of course it is possible, the point is when? We have time differences here. Until next week I can be online to discuss this anytime of the day. ;o) What about others? mazza -------------------- Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted. On Wed, 22 May 2002, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote: !On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:03:15AM -0700, Sky High wrote: !> > not so fast, I need people to work with, I just try !> > to convince all of you to agree with me. My first !> > paragraph is : Why to do another http server if we !> > want something else ? It means : let's do server !> > that _can_ do http sessions, but not only. !> !> Ok, we have discussed (me and mazza) about extending !> this project to beyond http frontier, as mazza's !> friend !> had concepted, and we have chosen start with a http !> chat server. After that, we could choose any other !> direction to the project. I guess we could discuss !> that again. ! !Is this possible to meet all of us on IRC channel ? and discuss about that in realtime ? ! !-- ! !Marcin Krzyzanowski !www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl !email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... !IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci ! !_______________________________________________________________ ! !Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference !August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm ! !_______________________________________________ !Cchatd-devel mailing list !Cch...@li... !https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel ! |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-22 14:00:57
|
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:03:15AM -0700, Sky High wrote: > > not so fast, I need people to work with, I just try > > to convince all of you to agree with me. My first > > paragraph is : Why to do another http server if we > > want something else ? It means : let's do server > > that _can_ do http sessions, but not only. > > Ok, we have discussed (me and mazza) about extending > this project to beyond http frontier, as mazza's > friend > had concepted, and we have chosen start with a http > chat server. After that, we could choose any other > direction to the project. I guess we could discuss > that again. Is this possible to meet all of us on IRC channel ? and discuss about that in realtime ? -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-16 15:12:33
|
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:15:12AM -0300, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote: > > Marcin: > > The main pupouse of cchatd is being a web-chat, that means, a chat > through web (http). This is due to the facility of not havin a specific > client. No, web != http. > Being compatible with HTTP and HTML means that any web browser is > pontencialy a client of cchatd, no downloads necessary. ;o) yes but why do not use cgi+apache based solutions ? is it insufficient ? > Well, I know you could help us a lot, but if you think that your > programming skills must be used in another project, then go, I'm sure > you'll be very helpful there ;o) not so fast, I need people to work with, I just try to convince all of you to agree with me. My first paragraph is : Why to do another http server if we want something else ? It means : let's do server that _can_ do http sessions, but not only. -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2002-05-16 14:15:20
|
Marcin: The main pupouse of cchatd is being a web-chat, that means, a chat through web (http). This is due to the facility of not havin a specific client. Being compatible with HTTP and HTML means that any web browser is pontencialy a client of cchatd, no downloads necessary. ;o) Well, I know you could help us a lot, but if you think that your programming skills must be used in another project, then go, I'm sure you'll be very helpful there ;o) Anyway, the cchatd project is always open for you. mazza -------------------- Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted. On Thu, 16 May 2002, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote: !Hi ! ! !Last night I take a look at this code and... I'm affraid that I make a !mistake and missunderstand goal of that project. I thought that you want !to do a chat server, but when I looked in code I realize that you think !about html based chat system. Sorry, but html-based chat system is not !acceptable by me. Why to create http server for chat only ? ! !In my oppinion it should be more universal server for chat systems (chat !need instant connection), and with that in my mind I wrote about threads !limits etc. . ! !I'm depressed. ! !-- ! !Marcin Krzyzanowski !www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl !email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... !IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci ! !_______________________________________________________________ ! !Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply !the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... !_______________________________________________ !Cchatd-devel mailing list !Cch...@li... !https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel ! |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-16 10:02:07
|
Hi Last night I take a look at this code and... I'm affraid that I make a mistake and missunderstand goal of that project. I thought that you want to do a chat server, but when I looked in code I realize that you think about html based chat system. Sorry, but html-based chat system is not acceptable by me. Why to create http server for chat only ? In my oppinion it should be more universal server for chat systems (chat need instant connection), and with that in my mind I wrote about threads limits etc. . I'm depressed. -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2002-05-15 19:25:23
|
Marcin: cchatd is working, it's kind of instable, but it is working. Any doubt you can ask me, I'll surely help. What do we need to do? We need first of all define what changes will be needed in order to use fork instead of pthreads. Probably all changes will be concentrated in main.c, and maybe a new file sharedmem.c. Probably what we have to do is fork instead of thread, this is the easy part. The other boring part is find where is needed and where isn't needed to use shared memory, one of the files I'm sure that we have to change is list.c, maybe client.c also. Just a note, avoid changing .h files, their padronizations is what garantees the modularity of the project. Anyway, feel free to do whatever you want, send me the changes later. mazza -------------------- Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted. On Wed, 15 May 2002, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote: !On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:04:38PM -0300, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote: !> Well, I'm sure that the most intelligent thing to do is implement a fork !> solution (yes, I was wrong, better accepting this now, then after the !> point of no return). So we need a volunteer to implement this. ! !I'll try to do something tonight, but i'm fucking tired. But still it not clean for me what exactly do we want ? ! !-- ! !Marcin Krzyzanowski !www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl !email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... !IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci ! ! !_______________________________________________ !Cchatd-devel mailing list !Cch...@li... !https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel ! |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-15 18:08:31
|
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:04:38PM -0300, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote: > Well, I'm sure that the most intelligent thing to do is implement a fork > solution (yes, I was wrong, better accepting this now, then after the > point of no return). So we need a volunteer to implement this. I'll try to do something tonight, but i'm fucking tired. But still it not clean for me what exactly do we want ? -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-15 17:13:28
|
Why do I receive 2 mail at one ? one send directly to me one to mailinglist ? Is this normal for sourceforge ? -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2002-05-15 16:06:41
|
The reality: threads HAS limits, ask to users to recompile libpthreads is unthinkable, surely the have more threaded applications and we can risk a incompatibility bug. But how long does a cchatd thread lives? For those who remembers the code (probably main.c) all threads ends after replying the http request, the keep-alive socket is kept into a list, with no thread directly associated to it. The major problem will happen when we build a interview room for high audiences. But is there any chance to recieve more then 1000 connection requests? Well, I'm sure that the most intelligent thing to do is implement a fork solution (yes, I was wrong, better accepting this now, then after the point of no return). So we need a volunteer to implement this. Does anybody feel inspired to do this? If don't I'll do it after I finish the new release of another project of mine (mini-pub v0.2 and mini-door v0.1) Let's have fun. mazza P.S.: mini-pub also need volunteers, any language is accepted, mult-plataform prefered. Pvt me if interested. -------------------- Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted. On Wed, 15 May 2002, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote: !On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:38:57AM -0700, Sky High wrote: !> About threads... !> !> Hi, I have told you about that thread limit, haven't !> I? !> If not, sorry. !> But don't worry too much. There is a way to go through !> this 1024 threads limit, but you must recompile !> libpthreads... not so difficult. :-) ! !Yes, but does it a sollution for many people ? maybe for you, me and a few people. I thik that it's not a solution. In my oppinion only solution is to mix threads and fork together. (we have to remember that fork have also limits) ! !-- ! !Marcin Krzyzanowski !www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl !email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... !IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci ! !_______________________________________________________________ ! !Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply !the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... !_______________________________________________ !Cchatd-devel mailing list !Cch...@li... !https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel ! |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-15 15:01:08
|
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:38:57AM -0700, Sky High wrote: > About threads... > > Hi, I have told you about that thread limit, haven't > I? > If not, sorry. > But don't worry too much. There is a way to go through > this 1024 threads limit, but you must recompile > libpthreads... not so difficult. :-) Yes, but does it a sollution for many people ? maybe for you, me and a few people. I thik that it's not a solution. In my oppinion only solution is to mix threads and fork together. (we have to remember that fork have also limits) -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Sky H. <_sk...@ya...> - 2002-05-15 13:39:12
|
About threads... Hi, I have told you about that thread limit, haven't I? If not, sorry. But don't worry too much. There is a way to go through this 1024 threads limit, but you must recompile libpthreads... not so difficult. :-) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2002-05-13 16:47:00
|
Marcin: The first cchatd concept was built in 1999 by our friend Felipe Waltrick, although he can't help us as much as he wanted to he is one of the project managers. The very first version of cchatd was implemented using forks, but we tried threads and I don't remember who have told that it should be better... whatever, let's try and try, according to the project concept and organization we shall be capable of changing modules without major changes. Feel free to send us fork patches. About next step, I have a document called VERSIONS.wannabe, it's a preview of what directions to follow and what to add in which release. I'm trying to submit this document to SF's document session, but aparently documents uploads are disabled :o( I'm sending you a copy of the file attached any way. Fabio A Mazzarino -------------------- Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted. On Mon, 13 May 2002, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote: !On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:45:46AM -0300, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote: !> !> Marcin: !> !> Well, about the threads x forks. I didin't know this thread limit, and !> knowing this at this time make me change my mind. Maybe it would be better !> if before stable releases we change threads to forks. But we need a better !> study. ! !Remember that processes after fork do not have shared memory and it have !to be replaced with something else because shared data is needed in chat !system... very... Fork's have also limits, the best solution (in my !oppinion) make processes that handle as much threads as they can, if !limit is reached then fork and contact with that second process via fast !file socket. It need of course prepare interserver communication but it !seems to be the best solution (imho). For chatrooms it should be !transparent solution. ! !Well currently i have a lot of work but I try to look at this code in !this week and maybe comment that what is already done. ! !It's very important to know what we want to do, and how. It have to be !specified at the start. ! !PS. sorry for my bad english. And yes I'm interessed in develop this !kind of soft. ! !-- ! !Marcin Krzyzanowski !www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl !email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... !IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci ! !_______________________________________________________________ ! !Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply !the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... !_______________________________________________ !Cchatd-devel mailing list !Cch...@li... !https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel ! |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-13 16:02:06
|
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:45:46AM -0300, Fabio A Mazzarino wrote: > > Marcin: > > Well, about the threads x forks. I didin't know this thread limit, and > knowing this at this time make me change my mind. Maybe it would be better > if before stable releases we change threads to forks. But we need a better > study. Remember that processes after fork do not have shared memory and it have to be replaced with something else because shared data is needed in chat system... very... Fork's have also limits, the best solution (in my oppinion) make processes that handle as much threads as they can, if limit is reached then fork and contact with that second process via fast file socket. It need of course prepare interserver communication but it seems to be the best solution (imho). For chatrooms it should be transparent solution. Well currently i have a lot of work but I try to look at this code in this week and maybe comment that what is already done. It's very important to know what we want to do, and how. It have to be specified at the start. PS. sorry for my bad english. And yes I'm interessed in develop this kind of soft. -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2002-05-13 14:46:50
|
Marcin: cchatd site was kind of almost dead, all develpment was being done by me at home with no cvs updates. I decided then to build a website, organize it a little bit more, new rules and more, and also publish it at freshmeat. But this list was almost dead until today. I was going to annouce the new today so old members could know the changes (the ones that you probably have seen in cchatd website). I'll send soon a message to the list with the changes, I was waiting for the statistics *after* the freshmeat annoucements. Well, about the threads x forks. I didin't know this thread limit, and knowing this at this time make me change my mind. Maybe it would be better if before stable releases we change threads to forks. But we need a better study. If we want to be capable of accepting more than 3000 users in a single interview room (this is the audience record in a interview room here in Brazil) we will certainly use forks instead of threads. Marcin, welcome to cchatd, I'm sure that your help will be very useful. Feel free to comment your java chat solutions maybe many solutions can be easyly implementend in cchatd ;o) Let's have fun. Fabio A Mazzarino -------------------- Looking for a better .sig. Suggestions are being accepted. On Mon, 13 May 2002, Marcin Krzyzanowski wrote: !Hi ! ! !It's interresing project, it's something that I thought about, but. !Using just threads server is limited to about 1024 threads in one time, !and new connections have to be supported by new process (fork) with !communication via something like sockets (Bassicaly it's interservers !communication). I thing that is clean that such server have to have !possibility to support a lot of instant connections at the same time !(it's a CHAT). What is you oppinion about that ? Is there implemented !something like that ? ! ! !PS. Currently i use java server for my chat project !(http://krzak.linux.net.pl/kChat/) it's also limited but no so as pure !pthreads, and I thing to move to something more efficient like C. ! ! !Regards. ! !-- ! !Marcin Krzyzanowski !www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl !email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... !IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci ! !_______________________________________________________________ ! !Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply !the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... !_______________________________________________ !Cchatd-devel mailing list !Cch...@li... !https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel ! |
|
From: Marcin K. <kr...@li...> - 2002-05-13 09:36:34
|
Hi It's interresing project, it's something that I thought about, but. Using just threads server is limited to about 1024 threads in one time, and new connections have to be supported by new process (fork) with communication via something like sockets (Bassicaly it's interservers communication). I thing that is clean that such server have to have possibility to support a lot of instant connections at the same time (it's a CHAT). What is you oppinion about that ? Is there implemented something like that ? PS. Currently i use java server for my chat project (http://krzak.linux.net.pl/kChat/) it's also limited but no so as pure pthreads, and I thing to move to something more efficient like C. Regards. -- Marcin Krzyzanowski www : http://krzak.linux.net.pl email : kr...@li..., kr...@tu... IRC : [krzyzak] @#linuxnews @#zdrowo_jebnieci |
|
From: Sky H. <_sk...@ya...> - 2001-12-19 10:44:36
|
Yes, (im a little late - sorry) this discussion is good enough and all comments bring us good insights about the question: "What do I write in those comments?" Hey, mazza! I'm working out that question ok? Recently, I have been using special marks in my comments so a documentation program could get that information and make a full doc for me! In this case, I am experiencing DoxyGen - which one shows me up good enough. - Happy Xmas, happy new year! --- Fabio A Mazzarino <ma...@al...> wrote: > Hi folks: > > I'm very glad with cchatd advance, although we are > not as fast as I intended to (ok, ok, I'm not that > administrator I intended to :o). But it's working > and that's ok. > > Now, let's take a look at a friend of ours sending > his commento to /. It's a very good start for well > documented code (skyhigh, is this enough for you) > > I intend to do like he propoused, I think it'll be > very productive. > > the link: > http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=24483&cid=2658330 > > Let's have fun. > > mazza.br > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2001-12-06 18:29:19
|
Hi folks: I'm very glad with cchatd advance, although we are not as fast as I = intended to (ok, ok, I'm not that administrator I intended to :o). But = it's working and that's ok. Now, let's take a look at a friend of ours sending his commento to /. = It's a very good start for well documented code (skyhigh, is this enough = for you) I intend to do like he propoused, I think it'll be very productive. the link: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3D24483&cid=3D2658330 Let's have fun. mazza.br |
|
From: rohan m. <roh...@st...> - 2001-12-01 01:14:18
|
> . user timeout (rohan, can you do this?) > . message header - time I volunteer for these two. Rohan __________________________________________________________________ Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au |
|
From: rohan m. <roh...@st...> - 2001-12-01 01:13:12
|
> . user timeout (rohan, can you do this?) > . message header - time I volunteer for these two. Rohan __________________________________________________________________ Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2001-11-28 03:53:43
|
Hi folks, it's me again: Now that we have a basic chat we need to verify what we need to do to submit the final v0.1 :o) from the list defined and (not that much) duscussed: . basic chat room functionality - ** OK ** . broadcast message - ** OK ** . private message - almost done . nickname handling . no duplicated nicks . no clones . user timeout (rohan, can you do this?) . message header - almost done . time . user - ** OK ** . one action description - by action_id or directly through http_get? . js scroll - almost done, I don't know how to do this. . ignore list - almost done So, do we have any kind of voluntaries? Let's have fun. mazza.br <mazza at altern.org> |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2001-11-28 03:48:49
|
Hi folks: I was supposed to send this yesterday, but I sent to the wrong address (duh) After sometime with no submmitions, I commited more code yesterday. Now we have a full functional chat, it can even compile! ;o) To compile: Just call make To run Well, this is a little bit more complicated. First you need to configure apache, and a virtual host (or even the main host) tho the http directory, and alos configure php4 After this is done just replace cchatd.green.net links for your localhost/virtal-host Well, using any web-brouser with frame support you can just call entrance.php file and no more secrets. A very simple, but functional web-chat. How is it organized? At main.c are the main function and the event interpretation At http.c no bigger changes, the same old http functions (some updates) At client.c also At list.c we can find the dynamic list functions, any changes at all At message.c are the message building functions. Here the messages that are sent to the clients are built (including html) At room.c room functions, no bigger changes too. And at sockets.c sockets functions, rohan is taking care of this file very very well (will he take cara of any other file too?) Ok, directions are done. Now we need to put a period in v0.1, I think it won't be too hard to do. Let's have fun. mazza.br <mazza at altern.org> |
|
From: Felipe W. <fpw...@ya...> - 2001-10-29 16:11:59
|
Folks, I didn't give up Cchad, but I've had some problems... On Friday night (Brazil GMT +3), I'm going to be on ICQ (12130291) and my "home computer" will have done to work. We can talk about... See u. --- Fabio A Mazzarino <ma...@al...> wrote: > Although a little bit slower development keeps > going on! :o) > > All modules fit completely (only a parameter > changing at a funcion in > client module). The engine is working (I'll submit > this week something), but > for now I only can send messages through URL line > :o/ > > I'm think about how to solve some problems with the > sender frame (the frame > with actions and message to be sent, and user > list..), for now I'll solve > this with PHP, no modules, just PHP. Later I think > we'll probably need a > parser (we'll need one to the config files too). > > So, if you folks think that cchatd is dead, you're > wrong. It's still alive, > and growing (not that fast, but it's growing) > > Next step is submit a working engine and build a > TODO list to finish v0.1. > After the basic engine is working you can send > sugestion for v0.2. Of course > that after v0.1 I'll look for private investments so > I can work full time > with free software. I know that it could be hard to > do this here in Brazil, > but I'll try anyway. > > Does anybody have anything to say? > > So let's have fun! > > Fabio A Mazzarino <mazza at altern.org> > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: C-Java Programer <pro...@ya...> > To: Fabio A Mazzarino <ma...@al...> > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:33 AM > Subject: ? > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I have to ask, Is everything OK? I haven't any > > contact with for a mounth. Please send me a > comment. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Ozzy > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > > http://personals.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Cchatd-devel mailing list > Cch...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cchatd-devel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com |
|
From: Fabio A M. <ma...@al...> - 2001-10-29 12:38:57
|
Although a little bit slower development keeps going on! :o) All modules fit completely (only a parameter changing at a funcion in client module). The engine is working (I'll submit this week something), but for now I only can send messages through URL line :o/ I'm think about how to solve some problems with the sender frame (the frame with actions and message to be sent, and user list..), for now I'll solve this with PHP, no modules, just PHP. Later I think we'll probably need a parser (we'll need one to the config files too). So, if you folks think that cchatd is dead, you're wrong. It's still alive, and growing (not that fast, but it's growing) Next step is submit a working engine and build a TODO list to finish v0.1. After the basic engine is working you can send sugestion for v0.2. Of course that after v0.1 I'll look for private investments so I can work full time with free software. I know that it could be hard to do this here in Brazil, but I'll try anyway. Does anybody have anything to say? So let's have fun! Fabio A Mazzarino <mazza at altern.org> ----- Original Message ----- From: C-Java Programer <pro...@ya...> To: Fabio A Mazzarino <ma...@al...> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:33 AM Subject: ? > Hi everybody, > > I have to ask, Is everything OK? I haven't any > contact with for a mounth. Please send me a comment. > > Thanks. > > Ozzy > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com |
|
From: rohan m. <roh...@st...> - 2001-10-15 08:32:40
|
Ok, i've worked out a slightly different network model, now i understand the base better: 1) In the main thread, have a main socket listening(socket is blocking as we dont need to use any non-blocking functions). Check for incoming connections with select. When an incoming connection is detected, spawn a thread: 2) The connection is accepted and put into the client structure. Then the thread uses a blocking recv to get incoming data(as it's in a seperate thread, this does not impede the rest of the program). 3) The request is processed and the thread exits. I'm not quite sure about this part, but I think it is about right... Hope this fits, Rohan PS I've got cvs working now, it was trying to use an anonymous account instead of my real one. __________________________________________________________________ Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au |
