[ccextractor-users] [GSoC] Test suite - latest test round - Including Ruslan's patch
Brought to you by:
cfsmp3
|
From: Willem v. i. <wil...@gm...> - 2014-06-01 12:15:57
|
Hello all, I've ran the latest version of CCExtractor from Github, and then the latest with Ruslan's patch. I'll give an overview of the broken files: Current github repo (compared to 0.69, and verified to be worse than 0.69): Regression/Correct/No XDS/CBLT.mpg Regression/Correct/No XDS/glenn_beck_20110425_1657.ts Regression/Correct/With XDS/CCSample1.mpg Regression/Correct/With XDS/images.mpg Regression/Correct/With XDS/The.Colbert.Report.2011-09-12.1080i.HDTV.MPEG-2-CtrlHD.ts Regression/Correct/With XDS/The.Daily.Show.with.Jon.Stewart.2011-09-08.1080i.HDTV.MPEG-2-CtrlHD-xds-solo-content-advisory.ts Regression/Correct/With XDS/WLS.mpg Regression/Minor issues/163ce77200976977847a5d66a537871b.20110901205100.mpg Ruslan's victoria_justice branch (compared to 0.69, verified to be worse than 0.69): Regression/Correct/No XDS/CBLT.mpg Regression/Correct/With XDS/images.mpg Regression/Minor issues/163ce77200976977847a5d66a537871b.20110901205100.mpg To be 100% sure, I cloned the latest github to my own repository, applied Ruslan's patch, built it and ran the tests again. The results were the same, so I think Ruslan did a very good job on the patch :) I'm still working on threading the test suite, it seems to be faster than no threading, but I'm not sure if it's (long term) good for your HDD though :p Once I finished it I'll leave the user the choice between threading and non-threading. Sincerely, Willem |