Re: [ccextractor-users] [Test program] Feedback wanted on reports
Brought to you by:
cfsmp3
|
From: Carlos F. <cf...@gm...> - 2014-05-16 18:57:12
|
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:15 PM, anshul <ans...@gm...> wrote: > > if some user want to use our test suite, then he will having only binary > in unix at /usr/bin and windows at system32, so path will not always > suggest the version used to generate that output. Nah, forget about some user :-) It's just us, developers. Users don't bother with this stuff, they just email to complain. If we're lucky they say something like "this file worked in 0.43 but I just upgraded to 0.69 after 4 years and now it doesn't work". Probably we'll have our own builds in our home directories and we want to check that we didn't break something. > - - Let the tester define the version he's running (either in a config > file, or a command that needs to be passed) Expect version not to be 0.69, or 0.70, but "Willem's build from git at 2014-05-16". > I don't know which one you'd prefer, and which one would be the best > to distinguish several versions from each other. I think path and timestamp. |