Re: [ccextractor-users] [Test program] Feedback wanted on reports

[Carlos F. <cf...@gm...>]

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Willem Van Iseghem
<wil...@gm...> wrote:
>
> 1) (default) is the HTML report generator. It generates reports based

I think this one should include information such as how the correct
file was generated (i.e. which CCExtractor version did it) so if we
generate a wrong file we can compare the code to find out what we
broke.

> A disadvantage of the html is that it grows large pretty fast when you

Do you have everything preloaded in the html or load on demand?

> process a lot of files or some really large output files. the TXT is
> smaller, but (imho) visually less interesting.

The txt might be convenient to cut and paste in email, for example.
Anyway it's a "professional" tool :-) It needs to assist in verifying
that we didn't break things with changes, that's all. If it does the
job well then that's all that's needed.