Re: [cbm4linux-users] driver error
Brought to you by:
cbm4linux
From: <mik...@dn...> - 2004-03-19 20:53:34
|
Michael Klein wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Mikko Kein=E4nen wrote: >=20 >=20 >>Michael Klein wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Mikko Kein=E4nen wrote: >>> >>>>Any ideas why I get the following error message in every other time= I >>>>issue a disk command: >>>> >>>>bash-2.05b$ d64copy --transfer=3Ds1 -w 8 the_pawn-disk1-sixpackB.d6= 4 >>>>[Fatal] drive 08 (1541): 99, DRIVER ERROR,00,00 >>>> >>>>And next time it works just fine? Then it fails. After that it's ok= and >>>>so on... ;) >>> >>>Odd. Is that the case for *all* disk commands or only d64copy (or ma= ybe >>>serial1-specific?). Your drive contains a normal 1541 ROM, I assume? >> >>Yes, I think it happens with all the commands ... just tested with >>cbmctrl -command and it seems now that the error doesn't show up so >>often, it seems more random: >=20 >=20 > [occasional errors snipped] >=20 >=20 >>>Unfortunately I have no running 2.6 kernel right now, and I wasn't a= ble >>>to reproduce this behaviour with 2.4. >> >>Maybe I should test with 2.4 kernel... I had no problems with 2.4 ker= nel >>some time ago when I installed cbm4linux ... the hardware setup shoul= d >>be the same in my computer now as it was then. >=20 >=20 > Just copied a .d64 to and from a 1541-II using -t original with a > freshly compiled 2.6.4 kernel without problems here (well, except for= a > minor compile-time fix because parport_enumerate() seems to have gone= ) :-/ >=20 > Please check the syslog; it should tell you whether the I/O-error occ= urs > while reading or writing. Hi, and thanks again. Just unloaded and loaded again and tested some disk operations with=20 cbmctrl and here is part from my /var/log/messages: Mar 19 22:45:21 localhost cbm_init: using passive (XM1541) cable, irq 7 Mar 19 22:45:21 localhost cbm: resetting devices Mar 19 22:45:22 localhost cbm: sleeping 5 seconds... Mar 19 22:46:06 localhost cbm_read: I/O error Well, it's not a big problem anyway. Since most of the time it now seem= s=20 to work just fine. Regards, Mikko. |