canonscanner-devel Mailing List for Canon scanner backend
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
volodya
Menu
▾
▴
canonscanner-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(16) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(26) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2003-07-01 16:42:54
|
Try using Snoopy (http://www.linux-usb.org - Tools) to look at USB traffic. Also check large manufacturers for datasheets of USB controllers for scanners that have specs similar to yours. Also, check SANE - maybe they have a driver for your scanner already. Lastly, it is not impossible that your scanner is scsi - with a USB to scsi converter. best Vladimir Dergachev On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, David Kvarnberg wrote: > > Hi, > Anyone working on support for the CanoScan 5000F (0x04a9/0x2212)? > > If not, has anyone got pointers to where/how I could start? > > I tried modifying ct_N1240U, but it won't even get past the > soft_reset(), so I guess there's simply no LM9833 chip in the 5000F > scanner. > > Regards, David > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel > |
|
From: David K. <da...@me...> - 2003-07-01 10:46:19
|
Hi, Anyone working on support for the CanoScan 5000F (0x04a9/0x2212)? If not, has anyone got pointers to where/how I could start? I tried modifying ct_N1240U, but it won't even get past the soft_reset(), so I guess there's simply no LM9833 chip in the 5000F scanner. Regards, David |
|
From: Tim T. <tim...@pa...> - 2003-02-13 23:59:07
|
Hi there, I've got a Canon D646Uex scanner, and I'm keen to have a try at writing a driver for it. I initially thought it was a LM9832 based scanner, but running the plustek driver after recompiling it with the usb device numbers of the 646U gives: .... [plustek] usbDev_open(auto,) [plustek] Autodetection... [plustek] Found device at >/dev/usbscanner0< [plustek] Device >/dev/usbscanner< ignoring [plustek] Device >/dev/usb/scanner0< ignoring [plustek] Vendor ID=0x04A9, Product ID=0x220B [plustek] usbio_DetectLM983x [plustek] UIO error [plustek] This is not a LM9831 or LM9832 chip based scanner. [plustek] open failed: -1 [plustek] sane_get_devices (0xbffff8b8, 0) .... So maybe it's not :( I see you guys have canon-test-D646U in your ct stuff, so I was wondering who was playing with it, and how far they got? I've posted on the plustek list, but now it looks like it may not be a LM9832, they can't really help. Any ideas, or other places to look? Cheers, Tim. |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-12-06 20:19:41
|
YES! I had a little time now to try and what i see it goes! It's a bit slower than under windows and sometimes crashes, but for the N656U it's seems to work well. Angelo --- Johann Philipp <joh...@we...> wrote: > Hi guys, > > in the newest sane-1.0.9 is a backend, which > supports in general LM983x based > scanners and in special CanoScan N650U / N656U and > N670U / N676U. I had a > look on this backend (Plustek) and could make with > few adaptions my N1240U go > to work with it. Please have a look on it, too. I > think that code is much > more advanced than what we have produced so far > (includes already calibration > routines). > > Johann > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the > basics of securing > your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE > TRIAL of a Thawte > Server Certificate: > http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com |
|
From: Johann P. <joh...@we...> - 2002-11-17 15:57:48
|
Hi guys, in the newest sane-1.0.9 is a backend, which supports in general LM983x based scanners and in special CanoScan N650U / N656U and N670U / N676U. I had a look on this backend (Plustek) and could make with few adaptions my N1240U go to work with it. Please have a look on it, too. I think that code is much more advanced than what we have produced so far (includes already calibration routines). Johann |
|
From: Christian <c.r...@ro...> - 2002-11-08 20:13:19
|
Hi, thanks. The codechanges have fixed the problem. As I have found out, the=20 newest version has two changes: 1. Even after a PC restart, the preview is done correct. This problem see= ms to=20 be gone now. 2. The begin of the scanarea seems to have moved. The first visible area = is=20 beyond the points of origin. I have done a screenshot. Have a look at thi= s=20 and you know what I mean. (Hopefully the jpeg is attached) Regards Christian |
|
From: Johann P. <joh...@we...> - 2002-11-08 19:03:31
|
Hi everyone,
I think I have found Christian's problem: Please replace the function "void
init_model_parms(CANON_USB_Handle *c_h)" in favour of the following version:
void
init_model_parms(CANON_USB_Handle *c_h)
{
if (!strcmp(c_h->dev->model, "N1240U") || !strcmp(c_h->dev->model, "N1220U")
{
c_h->model_parms[PAR_MAX_HZ_RES].i = 1200;
return;
}
if (!strcmp(c_h->dev->model, "N670U / N676U") || !strcmp(c_h->dev->model,
"N650U / N656U")) {
c_h->model_parms[PAR_MAX_HZ_RES].i = 600;
return;
}
DBG(0, "init_model_parms: Couldn't set c_h->model_parms[PAR_MAX_HZ_RES].i for
model %s\n", c_h->dev->model);
}
Sorry for my long lines in the code...
Johann
|
|
From: Johann P. <joh...@we...> - 2002-11-08 18:31:15
|
> Hi all, > > since the last cvs-update, my CanoScan N670U does not work anymore. Two > things have changed: > > 1. I updated to SuSE linux 8.1, which means, I am using gcc 3.2 now. But I > still use my own source compiled version sane-1.0.8. > > 2. The scanner is still be recognized and it starts to scan after pressing > preview. One thing is that my very much loved xsane does not show anything > of the scanner-template while previewing. At the other site I can not break > previewing with the cancel-button!? This brought me much noise at the first > time, when the scanner did not stop at the end :-) I had to pull the > plugger (Hopefully means Stecker). > While the sensor is moving I could swear, the sound has changed. It now > listens much more smoother. Questions: Does the old backend version work with your new SuSE? What about debugging messages? Johann |
|
From: Christian <c.r...@ro...> - 2002-11-08 16:44:10
|
Hi all, since the last cvs-update, my CanoScan N670U does not work anymore. Two t= hings=20 have changed: 1. I updated to SuSE linux 8.1, which means, I am using gcc 3.2 now. But = I=20 still use my own source compiled version sane-1.0.8. 2. The scanner is still be recognized and it starts to scan after pressin= g=20 preview. One thing is that my very much loved xsane does not show anythin= g of=20 the scanner-template while previewing. At the other site I can not break=20 previewing with the cancel-button!? This brought me much noise at the fir= st=20 time, when the scanner did not stop at the end :-) I had to pull the plug= ger=20 (Hopefully means Stecker). While the sensor is moving I could swear, the sound has changed. It now=20 listens much more smoother. I am very sad about the new behaviour, because now the code is unuseable = for=20 me at the moment and I do not knwo, what has changed. A short explanation, what I had done after updating SuSE: 1. I uninstalled the sane-1.0.9 2. I moved to sane-backend sourcedir and made: make uninstall make distclean =2E/configure make make install 3. I put canon_usb back to dll.conf 4. canonusb.conf has /dev/usbscanner inside So, I think I have not made any mistakes. Please, who can help me with a suggestion or anything else? Regards Christian P.S.: I took some days, until I could post you that text. Please do not b= e=20 anger. |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-11-07 10:12:01
|
Hi, this short is only to say that i've downloaded new code and rebuilt the sane rpm (fyi 1.0.8 for mdk) and as you said it recognizes the scanner correctly and starts acquiring, bat it never stops the engine as i told before. I agree with you that is very good thing to use sane standard macroes. I never read documentation on it so i tried with mine. if you have partial changes to try on my HW feel free to contact me. I'm very busy now (and too tired in the nigth) to try to understand the "sniffed" data. Hope to comeback early Angelo --- Johann Philipp <joh...@we...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > it is astonishing what one can do in only one free > weekend... On CVS should > be a new version for the backend. There are no > dramatic changes, but I > straightened out a few things and integrated those > things that were mentioned > on the list (I hope I didn't forget something). Here > in short: > - Detection supports the models 650/656, 670/676, > 1220, 1240 according to > Alberts list, > - Possible devices are read from a config file now. > Christian: I had to > rewrite your code some, because it stopped after the > first non-comment line. > This took me to rewrite the whole procedure a bit, > see also README file. > Angelo: putting some more info into the config file > seems to be good for > testing things, but we must parse it then... > - added debugging macros. Angelo: Just for the sake > of standardisation I took > the predefined SANE macros. Remember to set the > environment variables (see > README file). > - added some more options. > - changed / fixed various small things, thanks for > testing! > > The changes affect mainly the sane-part. So > unfortunately 650/656 and 1220 > users won't probably be able to work with it yet. > These are the next things > to do: > - get all detected scanners more or less to work. > I'll try to extract some > info's out of Vladimirs test program. > - start callibration. The LM9831 Software Designers > Guide from > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Mouse/5403/ > should help > - straighten out some things regarding color modes > and preview scanning. > > Be patient, the next free weekend for me will come > sometime, meanwhile please > test! > > best > Johann > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2 |
|
From: Johann P. <joh...@we...> - 2002-11-03 12:57:42
|
Hi everyone, please forget about this message, I just need to test my list membership, cause I have / had some proplems. Johann |
|
From: Johann P. <joh...@we...> - 2002-10-27 21:43:46
|
Hi everyone, it is astonishing what one can do in only one free weekend... On CVS should be a new version for the backend. There are no dramatic changes, but I straightened out a few things and integrated those things that were mentioned on the list (I hope I didn't forget something). Here in short: - Detection supports the models 650/656, 670/676, 1220, 1240 according to Alberts list, - Possible devices are read from a config file now. Christian: I had to rewrite your code some, because it stopped after the first non-comment line. This took me to rewrite the whole procedure a bit, see also README file. Angelo: putting some more info into the config file seems to be good for testing things, but we must parse it then... - added debugging macros. Angelo: Just for the sake of standardisation I took the predefined SANE macros. Remember to set the environment variables (see README file). - added some more options. - changed / fixed various small things, thanks for testing! The changes affect mainly the sane-part. So unfortunately 650/656 and 1220 users won't probably be able to work with it yet. These are the next things to do: - get all detected scanners more or less to work. I'll try to extract some info's out of Vladimirs test program. - start callibration. The LM9831 Software Designers Guide from http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Mouse/5403/ should help - straighten out some things regarding color modes and preview scanning. Be patient, the next free weekend for me will come sometime, meanwhile please test! best Johann |
|
From: Johann P. <joh...@we...> - 2002-10-27 21:40:09
|
Hi everyone, it is astonishing what one can do in only one free weekend... On CVS should be a new version for the backend. There are no dramatic changes, but I straightened out a few things and integrated those things that were mentioned on the list (I hope I didn't forget something). Here in short: - Detection supports the models 650/656, 670/676, 1220, 1240 according to Alberts list, - Possible devices are read from a config file now. Christian: I had to rewrite your code some, because it stopped after the first non-comment line. This took me to rewrite the whole procedure a bit, see also README file. Angelo: putting some more info into the config file seems to be good for testing things, but we must parse it then... - added debugging macros. Angelo: Just for the sake of standardisation I took the predefined SANE macros. Remember to set the environment variables (see README file). - added some more options. - changed / fixed various small things, thanks for testing! The changes affect mainly the sane-part. So unfortunately 650/656 and 1220 users won't probably be able to work with it yet. These are the next things to do: - get all detected scanners more or less to work. I'll try to extract some info's out of Vladimirs test program. - start callibration. The LM9831 Software Designers Guide from http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Mouse/5403/ should help - straighten out some things regarding color modes and preview scanning. Be patient, the next free weekend for me will come sometime, meanwhile please test! best Johann |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-10-23 20:14:09
|
Hi Unfortunatly at this time i have very little free time and i cannot do all the test i'd like to do. However i tryed to use usbsniffer under windows but the most of time it crashed or block my system, hope having more time as soon as possible to read better the documentation. I've also put some of Vladimir settings on middle level, but without good results. I guess Vladimir's going to work on sane integration maybe i can help till our hardware is similar. However i made some changes on file canon_usb.c i added some feature in addition to the Christian's one. I added definition of log_printf, but i'd like to add into low level (canon_usb_low.h) so that it can be used into all levels. What do you think about it? Moreover i added the two different ioctl so if the first fails, the second one can go on. For further steps i'd like to add code to read more info on configuration file (thanks to Christian for the idea), data like x and y range and moreover product_id to make possible to test sane with similar usb scanner simply cahanging the conf file. What do you think about this? Angelo |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-10-14 12:09:43
|
Hi, I'm sorry but this week-end i could not try anything because i was out. I'm going to try to sniff my usb port and try to understand how the registers you sayd are set. However i've just download the LM9833 pdf document (hope not to have the LM9832, don't think the LM9831) to see more info on soft reset and other registers setting. I made some changes on code to have debug printfs only if a LOG_DEBUG macro is set. This can be usefull during this test phase. However when i'm able to give more significant changes about my scanner i'll post you the file to chose what it's needed. Thanks for all Angelo P.S. i forgot the button, yes i have only one button and sane seems to start acquiring only after pushing it. --- "Johann.Philipp" <joh...@we...> wrote: > Angelo, > > I'm quite sure, that your scanner needs different > settings in the > config_paper_sense_and_misc_io(...) function. As > Albert summarized, your > scanner has only one button, all those that didn't > have the problems were of > the 3 buttons type. I know only one way to find out > about the settings, you > need to use a usbsniffer under windows, to find out, > how the registers 0x58 > through 0x5b are set. Unfortunately I don't think > you should use my software > before you have figured out this! > One alternative: you said, that the test program > from Vladimir (ct1220) > worked for you. Try to find out, how he sets these > registers. > > Good luck! > > Johann > > > Hi, > > I'm happy to say that now the scanner starts. > > I don't know if it's afeatures or not, but i > > have to push the button to start aquiring > > the image. > > However i've got some probems yet. The engine > > starts and the image is aquired well till > > the dimension, but never stops and i have to > unplug > > the scanner and from now on the position of the > > led is on the wrong place and the only way to > > put it back is to go on windows. > > Any try to scan new image force the engine to > > go over the limits... > > > > now if i use ct-1220 stand alone program it scans > > correctly the image but the final position of > > led remains on the other side. > > > > Any helps? > > > > Thanks > > Angelo > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > > Can...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com |
|
From: Christian <c.r...@ro...> - 2002-10-14 08:11:00
|
Am Samstag, 5. Oktober 2002 18:18 schrieb Johann.Philipp: > Hi guys, > > I haven't got any feedback, whether my proposed change in the > soft_reset(...) function did fix the strange behaviour at first scan af= ter > boot. Please tell me! Hi, Although I tested the modification in soft_reset(...), it has not changed= =20 anything. It is just like I never had put a line there. By the way: Could you please apply my sent patch to CVS? It has a little=20 bugfix in sane_open(...). But: I would reset the range-values for y_Range= and=20 y_Range in the patch before modifieing the code. This would be great. Thanx Christian |
|
From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2002-10-13 19:32:03
|
Johann - I tried out your sane backend - good work !
Unfortunately it did not work for me. I have canon 1220U and (after
getting it to recognize usb id 0x2207) homing does not seem to work at
all. The code that waits for engine idle just spins there even though the
head is perfectly homed. I remember this part to be tricky as well and
ct_1220U.c still cannot home correctly when the scanner head is at the
other end of the scanner.
Also I found out why sourceforge is rejecting your e-mails - it thinks for
some reason that the From line says that your e-mail is from
johann.philipp (without any @ symbols). This is likely a problem with your
e-mail client or mail delivery agent.
best
Vladimir Dergachev
|
|
From: Johann.Philipp <joh...@we...> - 2002-10-05 16:28:45
|
Angelo, I'm quite sure, that your scanner needs different settings in the config_paper_sense_and_misc_io(...) function. As Albert summarized, your scanner has only one button, all those that didn't have the problems were of the 3 buttons type. I know only one way to find out about the settings, you need to use a usbsniffer under windows, to find out, how the registers 0x58 through 0x5b are set. Unfortunately I don't think you should use my software before you have figured out this! One alternative: you said, that the test program from Vladimir (ct1220) worked for you. Try to find out, how he sets these registers. Good luck! Johann > Hi, > I'm happy to say that now the scanner starts. > I don't know if it's afeatures or not, but i > have to push the button to start aquiring > the image. > However i've got some probems yet. The engine > starts and the image is aquired well till > the dimension, but never stops and i have to unplug > the scanner and from now on the position of the > led is on the wrong place and the only way to > put it back is to go on windows. > Any try to scan new image force the engine to > go over the limits... > > now if i use ct-1220 stand alone program it scans > correctly the image but the final position of > led remains on the other side. > > Any helps? > > Thanks > Angelo > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel |
|
From: Johann.Philipp <joh...@we...> - 2002-10-05 16:17:49
|
Hi guys, I haven't got any feedback, whether my proposed change in the soft_reset(...) function did fix the strange behaviour at first scan after boot. Please tell me! Johann |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-10-05 15:57:43
|
Hi, I'm happy to say that now the scanner starts. I don't know if it's afeatures or not, but i have to push the button to start aquiring the image. However i've got some probems yet. The engine starts and the image is aquired well till the dimension, but never stops and i have to unplug the scanner and from now on the position of the led is on the wrong place and the only way to put it back is to go on windows. Any try to scan new image force the engine to go over the limits... now if i use ct-1220 stand alone program it scans correctly the image but the final position of led remains on the other side. Any helps? Thanks Angelo __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com |
|
From: Christian <c.r...@ro...> - 2002-10-04 12:28:45
|
Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2002 11:52 schrieb R N dev: > Hi! > the patch was what i needed to start the engines. > When starting acquiring images the noise comes and > never gives up. I understand that some parameters > about scanning area are wrong. I'm going to > search on mail archive similar problems to calibrate > my scanner... but i'll do tonight. Have a look at y_range and x_range - I think - canon_usb.c or so. I playe= d=20 with these values (8.48 and 11.8) until they worked for me. Try values li= ke=20 8.00 and 11.00. Maybe your scanner documentation helps you finding out th= e=20 correct values. Regards Christian > Now i see that either my changes or the Christian's > patch have common points that are > different respect the original file (i.e. > SCANNER_IOCTL_VENDOR and SCANNER_IOCTL_PRODUCT > definitions for ioctl). This > could mean that we have to do different data > structures for different kind of canon scanners. > > Angelo > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-10-04 09:52:37
|
Hi! the patch was what i needed to start the engines. When starting acquiring images the noise comes and never gives up. I understand that some parameters about scanning area are wrong. I'm going to search on mail archive similar problems to calibrate my scanner... but i'll do tonight. Now i see that either my changes or the Christian's patch have common points that are different respect the original file (i.e. SCANNER_IOCTL_VENDOR and SCANNER_IOCTL_PRODUCT definitions for ioctl). This could mean that we have to do different data structures for different kind of canon scanners. Angelo __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-10-03 09:51:34
|
Hi, Yes i think the problem is there. I have your patch but i havn't patched the file yet, this is the first thing i'm going to do tonight. Thanks Angelo --- Christian Rößner <c.r...@ro...> wrote: > Hi, > > are you using canon_usb_mid.c and canon_usb.c? I had > the same problems and I > found out, it was a problem in sane_get_devices() > and in sane_open(). I sent > a patch some days ago. Did you use this patch? > > Regards > > Christian [...] __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
|
From: Christian <c.r...@ro...> - 2002-10-03 09:31:21
|
Hi, are you using canon_usb_mid.c and canon_usb.c? I had the same problems an= d I=20 found out, it was a problem in sane_get_devices() and in sane_open(). I s= ent=20 a patch some days ago. Did you use this patch? Regards Christian Am Donnerstag, 3. Oktober 2002 11:22 schrieb R N dev: > Hi, Albert > > Unfortunately last night i didn't try to solve > the problem, however the proplem seems not to be > on the rights of device, I changed it before > use scanimage. Moreover it's also present when > trying by root. I used "strace scanimage" and > i saw that after having found the right device > the second open done fails and return > DEVICE_BUSY macro. > (really at this moment i don't remember either > the function name or the macro returned, but hope > to give more info tonight). > > Thanks > Angelo > > --- Albert Pauw <ap...@ch...> wrote: > [...] > > >Try it as user root, you probably don't have the > > rights to use it as a normal > > user. Try (as root): chmod 666 /dev/usb/scanner0 > > > > Albert > > [...] > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > http://sbc.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Canonscanner-devel mailing list > Can...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/canonscanner-devel |
|
From: R N d. <ran...@ya...> - 2002-10-03 09:22:13
|
Hi, Albert Unfortunately last night i didn't try to solve the problem, however the proplem seems not to be on the rights of device, I changed it before use scanimage. Moreover it's also present when trying by root. I used "strace scanimage" and i saw that after having found the right device the second open done fails and return DEVICE_BUSY macro. (really at this moment i don't remember either the function name or the macro returned, but hope to give more info tonight). Thanks Angelo --- Albert Pauw <ap...@ch...> wrote: [...] >Try it as user root, you probably don't have the > rights to use it as a normal > user. Try (as root): chmod 666 /dev/usb/scanner0 > > Albert [...] __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com |
1 message has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.