Should b7 not be freq 700 + freq 1500? In the default conf file it is 700 + 1100.. Am I missing something, I am reading that it should be the former and not the latter, is this right or wrong?
OK so it's late and I've just received this but let me tell you how delighted I am to have someone contact me about this. Thank you! At this point I'm incapable at working out whether it's right or wrong but I will check it out tomorrow and get back to you. Thank you for the feedback - it's truly delightful to know that anyone is still interested enough to comment!
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
OK so it's late and I've just received this but let me tell you how
delighted I am to have someone contact me about this. Thank you! At this
point I'm incapable at working out whether it's right or wrong but I will
check it out tomorrow and get back to you. Thank you for the feedback -
it's truly delightful to know that anyone is still interested enough to
comment!
Status: open Group: Created: Fri Dec 22, 2017 02:59 AM UTC by Al The Phoney Last Updated: Fri Dec 22, 2017 02:59 AM UTC Owner: Martin Wellard
Should b7 not be freq 700 + freq 1500? In the default conf file it is 700
+ 1100.. Am I missing something, I am reading that it should be the former
and not the latter, is this right or wrong?
Yep you're absolutely right - should be 700/1500.
Will sort that out. Although looking at this aged code I'm tempted to
rewrite the whole thing.
Regardless I'll move it to git and make sure it builds in recent Linuxes.
Thanks for the inspiration!
Status: open Group: Created: Fri Dec 22, 2017 02:59 AM UTC by Al The Phoney Last Updated: Fri Dec 22, 2017 02:59 AM UTC Owner: Martin Wellard
Should b7 not be freq 700 + freq 1500? In the default conf file it is 700
+ 1100.. Am I missing something, I am reading that it should be the former
and not the latter, is this right or wrong?
OK so it's late and I've just received this but let me tell you how delighted I am to have someone contact me about this. Thank you! At this point I'm incapable at working out whether it's right or wrong but I will check it out tomorrow and get back to you. Thank you for the feedback - it's truly delightful to know that anyone is still interested enough to comment!
No rush! I double checked with some very knowledgable people. and they also say it should be 700 + 1500 (also see http://www.phworld.org/network/signal.htm).
Thanks again for this sweet software.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Martin Wellard veghead@users.sf.net
wrote:
Related
Bugs: #2
Last edit: Al The Phoney 2017-12-22
Yep you're absolutely right - should be 700/1500.
Will sort that out. Although looking at this aged code I'm tempted to
rewrite the whole thing.
Regardless I'll move it to git and make sure it builds in recent Linuxes.
Thanks for the inspiration!
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Al The Phoney ase8seven@users.sf.net
wrote:
Related
Bugs: #2
[wrong thread, sorry, Im a SF noob]
Last edit: Al The Phoney 2017-12-22