Re: [cadcdev-tiki] Repo revision 231

[Dan P. <ba...@al...>]

On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Sam Steele wrote:

> Panther developers would need to have their own OpenAL framework  
> anyway, since it wasn't in the Tiki tree to begin with, unless I  
> missed it.  I always just removed the broken OpenAL.framework  
> reference and replaced it with the one from /System.

Yeah, true.

> I guess including OpenAL in Tiki would be a good solution, but it  
> would mean universal builds will take even longer :)

We have to do some munging somewhere anyway because Tiki doesn't  
depend on anything in Tiger per se, but if you make a universal  
binary with the default settings you'll get a Tiger-only binary.  
There are apparently some new settings in Xcode 2.2 that make it  
easier to mix and match versions. Seems like it'd be nice to have  
Panther compatibility out of the box (I'll certainly need it for any  
of my stuff...)

Not a vital thing to worry about though. If I get around to needing  
it I can add it myself.