Re: [cadcdev-tiki] Repo revision 231

[Sam S. <sam...@gm...>]

On Nov 19, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Dan Potter wrote:

> This (the OpenAL thing) is actually going to break compiling on  
> anything but Tiger (not sure if we care... but it'll also make  
> extra steps to compile a Panther-compatible app).

Panther developers would need to have their own OpenAL framework  
anyway, since it wasn't in the Tiki tree to begin with, unless I  
missed it.  I always just removed the broken OpenAL.framework  
reference and replaced it with the one from /System.

I guess including OpenAL in Tiki would be a good solution, but it  
would mean universal builds will take even longer :)

-Sam