Re: [Cachecc1-list] [ccache] Re: cachecc1

[Kelly O'H. <Kel...@Su...>]

Dito.

We don't use it for formal Release Engineering builds,
but we use it all the time to build the jdk in our automated build&test
system. Just wish we had it on Windows for Visual Studio.

-kto

Ross Cameron wrote:
> I still use it for bulk building a LOT of packages for my embedded OS,
> haven't needed to upgrade in AAAAAAAAGES but would appreciate the
> project not dying off :(
> 
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Simon Braunschmidt
> <sbr...@go...> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>  is cachecc1 still supported or used?
>>
>>  Last version is 0.3 from 2004.
>>
>>  I used it for a while but now i tracked down a bug in the linux kernel
>>  build system for arm architecture to the usage of cachecc1. The bug
>>  was actually the resuse of binary data that did in fact change, but
>>  the assembler call for cachecc1 read it from cache.
>>
>>  I can provide a detailed description of the steps to reproduce the
>>  bug, or compare:
>>  http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/msg/7ae8172becd5e51f
>>  (piggy.o gets wrongly compiled with data from cache)
>>
>>  It seems that the cachecc1 project is effectively dead so I really
>>  recommend to make this clear on the link to it from ccache homepage.
>>
>>  Best Regards
>>  Simon Braunschmidt
>>
>>  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
>>  Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m.,
>>  Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2.
>>  http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Cachecc1-list mailing list
>>  Cac...@li...
>>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cachecc1-list
>>
> 
> 
>