Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

hey can u please send me your conf files ???

On 6/22/07, Andrew Niemantsverdriet <and...@gm...> wrote:
>
> I did compile from source on the new box and then just copied over the
> config files. I will do some more testing and see what I can see. It
> worked on the bench before I put it in. The only difference was on the
> bench it was shaping traffic from the same subnet as the bridge. Could
> this be a problem?
>
> On 6/21/07, Larry Smith <le...@ec...> wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:33, pra...@gm... wrote:
> > > Can anyone consult for us in getting the bw tool build and work pls?
> > > Rates open.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Prab Balasubramanian
> > > Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <and...@gm...>
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:31:31
> > > To:bwm...@li...
> > > Subject: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)
> > >
> > >
> > > I had bwm-tools running in production for about 5 months. I had a
> > > harddrive go bad in the box last night. So lucky for me I had backups.
> > > I run my server in bridge mode so traffic continued to to flow so I
> > > don't think I made any stupid mistakes restoreing the backup because I
> > > was in a rush. Here is what I have found so far no shaping is occuring
> > > for any IP's listed, bwm-monitor will not work over ssh and traffic is
> > > for sure flowing through the bridge again.
> > >
> > > The box is bridged and has an IP of 192.168.100.10. The clients all
> > > connect using the 10.1.1.x subnet. The client "Office" should be
> > > limited to about 256k both directions and total bandwidth usage should
> > >  be about 256k.
> > >
> > > What is wrong? What won't bwm_monitor work? bwm_montior will just sit
> > > there when I run it no user interface appears, the only way to get
> > > back to the console is to 'ctrl c' which causes a segmentation fault.
> > > Where do I start to troubleshoot? It appears that everything starts
> > > fine. I did upgrade from Fedora Core 4 to CentOS 4.3 on the new drive
> > > but other than that everything should be identical.
> > >
> > > My once working config is pasted below (minus some unimportant data):
> > > <firewall>
> > >  <global>
> > >   <modules>
> > >    <load name="ip_queue"/>
> > >   </modules>
> > >
> > > #Begin Access Classes
> > > <class name="AllowSSH">
> > >   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="22"/>
> > > </class>
> > > <class name="AllowHTTP">
> > >   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="80"/>
> > > </class>
> > >
> > > #Begin Traffic Classes
> > > <class name="Office_out">
> > >   <address src="10.1.1.253"/>
> > > </class>
> > > <class name="Office_in">
> > >   <address src="! 10.1.1.253" dst="10.1.1.253"/>
> > > </class>
> > > </global>
> > >
> > > #Access Control Lists
> > > <acl>
> > >   <table name="filter">
> > >    <chain name="INPUT" default="DROP">
> > >     <rule name="allowed_traffic" target="ACCEPT">
> > >      AllowSSH
> > >      AllowHTTP
> > >     </rule>
> > >    </chain>
> > >    <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
> > >     <rule name="controlled_traf" target="bwmd">
> > >      Office_in
> > >      Office_out
> > >     </rule>
> > >     <rule name="disabled_traf" target="DROP">
> > >     </rule>
> > >    </chain>
> > >    <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
> > >    </chain>
> > >   </table>
> > > </acl>
> > >
> > > #Traffic Flows
> > > <traffic>
> > >   <flow name="traffic_total" max-rate="7680000" queue-len="5"
> > > queue-size="4500" report-timeout="60">
> > >  <flow name="flow_Office_total" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
> > >    <flow name="flow_Office_out" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> > > nfmark="101">
> > >      Office_out;
> > >    </flow>
> > >    <flow name="flow_Office_in" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> > > nfmark="102">
> > >      Office_in;
> > >    </flow>
> > >  </flow>
> > >
> > >   </flow>
> > > </traffic>
> > > </firewall>
> > >
> >
> > While definitely not qualified to speak for BWM-Tools, I highly suspect
> (from
> > doing similar myself) that you are going to have to actually compile the
> > bwm_monitor, bwmd, etc on the new OS (Centos) versus just copying it
> over
> > from backups (if this is actually what you did).
> >
> > If you compiled bwm from source on the Centos box, and simply copied
> your
> > configs in, then something did not go right in the compile, go back and
> do it
> > again and pay particular attention to the configure logs and the output
> of
> > the make, make install.
> >
> > --
> > Larry Smith
> > SysAd ECSIS.NET
> > sy...@ec...
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> > bwm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>

-- 
Regards,

Prashant Soni
Sr. Network Engineer
Elecon Information Technology LTD.
+91-9825164844
+91-2692-231217