bwm-tools-tech — General & Technical Discussion

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Experience with libnetfilter-queue

[Simon P. <dn...@gm...>]

> > I'd like to ask what your experience with the libnetfilter-queue
> > library are. I'm planning to implement some traffic shaping app on
> > my own using libnetfilter-queue and I wonder how efficient it is.
> Best thing about QUEUE is it can send only the packet headers to
> userspace, in which case you ack or nack it.

Is it also able to queue whole packets to userspace, which can be
mangled there and queued back to the kernel?

> I've tested it out processing about 5k pkt/s @ just under 100Mbit/s
> (if I remember correctly) on a Pentium D 2.4 with about 10-20% cpu
> utilization.

Sounds good enough for me.

Thanks!
Simon

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Experience with libnetfilter-queue

[Nigel K. <nk...@lb...>]

Hi Simon,

> I'd like to ask what your experience with the libnetfilter-queue
> library are. I'm planning to implement some traffic shaping app on my
> own using libnetfilter-queue and I wonder how efficient it is.
> bwm-tools is the first program I came across that uses
> libnetfilter-queue, that's why I ask here.
>
> Can I pipe big numbers of packets through libnetfilter-queue without
> noticeable latency or should I rather do it within the kernel directly?=

>  =20
Best thing about QUEUE is it can send only the packet headers to
userspace, in which case you ack or nack it.

I've tested it out processing about 5k pkt/s @ just under 100Mbit/s  (if
I remember correctly) on a Pentium D 2.4 with about 10-20% cpu utilizatio=
n.

-N

[bwm-tools-tech] Experience with libnetfilter-queue

[Simon P. <dn...@gm...>]

Hi,

I'd like to ask what your experience with the libnetfilter-queue
library are. I'm planning to implement some traffic shaping app on my
own using libnetfilter-queue and I wonder how efficient it is.
bwm-tools is the first program I came across that uses
libnetfilter-queue, that's why I ask here.

Can I pipe big numbers of packets through libnetfilter-queue without
noticeable latency or should I rather do it within the kernel directly?

Thanks,
Simon

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] About packaging and the vitality of the project

[Nigel K. <nk...@lb...>]

Hi,

> I've been using bwm-tools (just for bandwidth) for over two years, on a=

> very very low end system.  VoIP and wireless are being routed by it and=

> it simply works, and it works great!  I love it.
>  =20
Very glad you like it!!

> I'd like to package it for Debian, but I wonder if the project is alive=
=2E
> There aren't many releases (maybe there's no need to) and it's a supris=
e=20
> for me that not many people know about it.
>  =20
The project is slowly gaining momentum, we kinda lost one of our major
sponsors, so its not progressing very fast on the code development side.

The good thing is we've had some nice donations over the past few weeks
which have sparked some more research and development.

We're looking at adding tun/tap support as an option to netfilter's -j
QUEUE. This would mean bwmtools may even beable to run under any OS that
supports tun/tap. I've seen a tun/tap driver for Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD
& Windows, so I would think that would slingshot bwmtools quite a bit
forward.

> So, what do you think, should I go ahead and package it?
Go for it.

>   If people=20
> start reporting bugs or trying to send patches, will there be somebody
> on your side able to deal with that?
>  =20
Always  :o)


Kind Regards
Nigel

[bwm-tools-tech] About packaging and the vitality of the project

[<ed...@es...>]

Hi,

I've been using bwm-tools (just for bandwidth) for over two years, on a
very very low end system.  VoIP and wireless are being routed by it and
it simply works, and it works great!  I love it.

I'd like to package it for Debian, but I wonder if the project is alive.
There aren't many releases (maybe there's no need to) and it's a suprise 
for me that not many people know about it.

So, what do you think, should I go ahead and package it?  If people 
start reporting bugs or trying to send patches, will there be somebody
on your side able to deal with that?

Regards, Eduardo.

[bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

[someone k. <gun...@gm...>]

Hi Andrew,

You can try either of the steps,

In you running configuration just add the iptables rules

  iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT

      OR you can append this firewall.xml tags and reload the bwm_firewall
-l

#in the acl classes
<class name="loopback">
  <address src-iface="lo"/>
</class>

# In control lists inside the filter table in input chain add a rule

<rule name="loop" target="ACCEPT">
  loopback;
</rule>


After trying one of the following steps try running bwm_monitor.
Check for the traffice shaping and make sure of it.


--------------
with regards
Sudip Karki
Sys Admin
HealthNet Nepal.

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

[Prashant S. <spi...@gm...>]

hey can u please send me your conf files ???

On 6/22/07, Andrew Niemantsverdriet <and...@gm...> wrote:
>
> I did compile from source on the new box and then just copied over the
> config files. I will do some more testing and see what I can see. It
> worked on the bench before I put it in. The only difference was on the
> bench it was shaping traffic from the same subnet as the bridge. Could
> this be a problem?
>
> On 6/21/07, Larry Smith <le...@ec...> wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:33, pra...@gm... wrote:
> > > Can anyone consult for us in getting the bw tool build and work pls?
> > > Rates open.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Prab Balasubramanian
> > > Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <and...@gm...>
> > >
> > > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:31:31
> > > To:bwm...@li...
> > > Subject: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)
> > >
> > >
> > > I had bwm-tools running in production for about 5 months. I had a
> > > harddrive go bad in the box last night. So lucky for me I had backups.
> > > I run my server in bridge mode so traffic continued to to flow so I
> > > don't think I made any stupid mistakes restoreing the backup because I
> > > was in a rush. Here is what I have found so far no shaping is occuring
> > > for any IP's listed, bwm-monitor will not work over ssh and traffic is
> > > for sure flowing through the bridge again.
> > >
> > > The box is bridged and has an IP of 192.168.100.10. The clients all
> > > connect using the 10.1.1.x subnet. The client "Office" should be
> > > limited to about 256k both directions and total bandwidth usage should
> > >  be about 256k.
> > >
> > > What is wrong? What won't bwm_monitor work? bwm_montior will just sit
> > > there when I run it no user interface appears, the only way to get
> > > back to the console is to 'ctrl c' which causes a segmentation fault.
> > > Where do I start to troubleshoot? It appears that everything starts
> > > fine. I did upgrade from Fedora Core 4 to CentOS 4.3 on the new drive
> > > but other than that everything should be identical.
> > >
> > > My once working config is pasted below (minus some unimportant data):
> > > <firewall>
> > >  <global>
> > >   <modules>
> > >    <load name="ip_queue"/>
> > >   </modules>
> > >
> > > #Begin Access Classes
> > > <class name="AllowSSH">
> > >   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="22"/>
> > > </class>
> > > <class name="AllowHTTP">
> > >   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="80"/>
> > > </class>
> > >
> > > #Begin Traffic Classes
> > > <class name="Office_out">
> > >   <address src="10.1.1.253"/>
> > > </class>
> > > <class name="Office_in">
> > >   <address src="! 10.1.1.253" dst="10.1.1.253"/>
> > > </class>
> > > </global>
> > >
> > > #Access Control Lists
> > > <acl>
> > >   <table name="filter">
> > >    <chain name="INPUT" default="DROP">
> > >     <rule name="allowed_traffic" target="ACCEPT">
> > >      AllowSSH
> > >      AllowHTTP
> > >     </rule>
> > >    </chain>
> > >    <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
> > >     <rule name="controlled_traf" target="bwmd">
> > >      Office_in
> > >      Office_out
> > >     </rule>
> > >     <rule name="disabled_traf" target="DROP">
> > >     </rule>
> > >    </chain>
> > >    <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
> > >    </chain>
> > >   </table>
> > > </acl>
> > >
> > > #Traffic Flows
> > > <traffic>
> > >   <flow name="traffic_total" max-rate="7680000" queue-len="5"
> > > queue-size="4500" report-timeout="60">
> > >  <flow name="flow_Office_total" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
> > >    <flow name="flow_Office_out" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> > > nfmark="101">
> > >      Office_out;
> > >    </flow>
> > >    <flow name="flow_Office_in" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> > > nfmark="102">
> > >      Office_in;
> > >    </flow>
> > >  </flow>
> > >
> > >   </flow>
> > > </traffic>
> > > </firewall>
> > >
> >
> > While definitely not qualified to speak for BWM-Tools, I highly suspect
> (from
> > doing similar myself) that you are going to have to actually compile the
> > bwm_monitor, bwmd, etc on the new OS (Centos) versus just copying it
> over
> > from backups (if this is actually what you did).
> >
> > If you compiled bwm from source on the Centos box, and simply copied
> your
> > configs in, then something did not go right in the compile, go back and
> do it
> > again and pay particular attention to the configure logs and the output
> of
> > the make, make install.
> >
> > --
> > Larry Smith
> > SysAd ECSIS.NET
> > sy...@ec...
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> > bwm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>



-- 
Regards,

Prashant Soni
Sr. Network Engineer
Elecon Information Technology LTD.
+91-9825164844
+91-2692-231217

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

[Andrew N. <and...@gm...>]

I did compile from source on the new box and then just copied over the
config files. I will do some more testing and see what I can see. It
worked on the bench before I put it in. The only difference was on the
bench it was shaping traffic from the same subnet as the bridge. Could
this be a problem?

On 6/21/07, Larry Smith <le...@ec...> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:33, pra...@gm... wrote:
> > Can anyone consult for us in getting the bw tool build and work pls?
> > Rates open.
> > Thanks,
> > Prab Balasubramanian
> > Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <and...@gm...>
> >
> > Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:31:31
> > To:bwm...@li...
> > Subject: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)
> >
> >
> > I had bwm-tools running in production for about 5 months. I had a
> > harddrive go bad in the box last night. So lucky for me I had backups.
> > I run my server in bridge mode so traffic continued to to flow so I
> > don't think I made any stupid mistakes restoreing the backup because I
> > was in a rush. Here is what I have found so far no shaping is occuring
> > for any IP's listed, bwm-monitor will not work over ssh and traffic is
> > for sure flowing through the bridge again.
> >
> > The box is bridged and has an IP of 192.168.100.10. The clients all
> > connect using the 10.1.1.x subnet. The client "Office" should be
> > limited to about 256k both directions and total bandwidth usage should
> >  be about 256k.
> >
> > What is wrong? What won't bwm_monitor work? bwm_montior will just sit
> > there when I run it no user interface appears, the only way to get
> > back to the console is to 'ctrl c' which causes a segmentation fault.
> > Where do I start to troubleshoot? It appears that everything starts
> > fine. I did upgrade from Fedora Core 4 to CentOS 4.3 on the new drive
> > but other than that everything should be identical.
> >
> > My once working config is pasted below (minus some unimportant data):
> > <firewall>
> >  <global>
> >   <modules>
> >    <load name="ip_queue"/>
> >   </modules>
> >
> > #Begin Access Classes
> > <class name="AllowSSH">
> >   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="22"/>
> > </class>
> > <class name="AllowHTTP">
> >   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="80"/>
> > </class>
> >
> > #Begin Traffic Classes
> > <class name="Office_out">
> >   <address src="10.1.1.253"/>
> > </class>
> > <class name="Office_in">
> >   <address src="! 10.1.1.253" dst="10.1.1.253"/>
> > </class>
> > </global>
> >
> > #Access Control Lists
> > <acl>
> >   <table name="filter">
> >    <chain name="INPUT" default="DROP">
> >     <rule name="allowed_traffic" target="ACCEPT">
> >      AllowSSH
> >      AllowHTTP
> >     </rule>
> >    </chain>
> >    <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
> >     <rule name="controlled_traf" target="bwmd">
> >      Office_in
> >      Office_out
> >     </rule>
> >     <rule name="disabled_traf" target="DROP">
> >     </rule>
> >    </chain>
> >    <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
> >    </chain>
> >   </table>
> > </acl>
> >
> > #Traffic Flows
> > <traffic>
> >   <flow name="traffic_total" max-rate="7680000" queue-len="5"
> > queue-size="4500" report-timeout="60">
> >  <flow name="flow_Office_total" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
> >    <flow name="flow_Office_out" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> > nfmark="101">
> >      Office_out;
> >    </flow>
> >    <flow name="flow_Office_in" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> > nfmark="102">
> >      Office_in;
> >    </flow>
> >  </flow>
> >
> >   </flow>
> > </traffic>
> > </firewall>
> >
>
> While definitely not qualified to speak for BWM-Tools, I highly suspect (from
> doing similar myself) that you are going to have to actually compile the
> bwm_monitor, bwmd, etc on the new OS (Centos) versus just copying it over
> from backups (if this is actually what you did).
>
> If you compiled bwm from source on the Centos box, and simply copied your
> configs in, then something did not go right in the compile, go back and do it
> again and pay particular attention to the configure logs and the output of
> the make, make install.
>
> --
> Larry Smith
> SysAd ECSIS.NET
> sy...@ec...
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

[Larry S. <le...@ec...>]

On Thursday 21 June 2007 16:33, pra...@gm... wrote:
> Can anyone consult for us in getting the bw tool build and work pls?
> Rates open.
> Thanks,
> Prab Balasubramanian
> Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <and...@gm...>
>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:31:31
> To:bwm...@li...
> Subject: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)
>
>
> I had bwm-tools running in production for about 5 months. I had a
> harddrive go bad in the box last night. So lucky for me I had backups.
> I run my server in bridge mode so traffic continued to to flow so I
> don't think I made any stupid mistakes restoreing the backup because I
> was in a rush. Here is what I have found so far no shaping is occuring
> for any IP's listed, bwm-monitor will not work over ssh and traffic is
> for sure flowing through the bridge again.
>
> The box is bridged and has an IP of 192.168.100.10. The clients all
> connect using the 10.1.1.x subnet. The client "Office" should be
> limited to about 256k both directions and total bandwidth usage should
>  be about 256k.
>
> What is wrong? What won't bwm_monitor work? bwm_montior will just sit
> there when I run it no user interface appears, the only way to get
> back to the console is to 'ctrl c' which causes a segmentation fault.
> Where do I start to troubleshoot? It appears that everything starts
> fine. I did upgrade from Fedora Core 4 to CentOS 4.3 on the new drive
> but other than that everything should be identical.
>
> My once working config is pasted below (minus some unimportant data):
> <firewall>
>  <global>
>   <modules>
>    <load name="ip_queue"/>
>   </modules>
>
> #Begin Access Classes
> <class name="AllowSSH">
>   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="22"/>
> </class>
> <class name="AllowHTTP">
>   <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="80"/>
> </class>
>
> #Begin Traffic Classes
> <class name="Office_out">
>   <address src="10.1.1.253"/>
> </class>
> <class name="Office_in">
>   <address src="! 10.1.1.253" dst="10.1.1.253"/>
> </class>
> </global>
>
> #Access Control Lists
> <acl>
>   <table name="filter">
>    <chain name="INPUT" default="DROP">
>     <rule name="allowed_traffic" target="ACCEPT">
>      AllowSSH
>      AllowHTTP
>     </rule>
>    </chain>
>    <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
>     <rule name="controlled_traf" target="bwmd">
>      Office_in
>      Office_out
>     </rule>
>     <rule name="disabled_traf" target="DROP">
>     </rule>
>    </chain>
>    <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
>    </chain>
>   </table>
> </acl>
>
> #Traffic Flows
> <traffic>
>   <flow name="traffic_total" max-rate="7680000" queue-len="5"
> queue-size="4500" report-timeout="60">
>  <flow name="flow_Office_total" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
>    <flow name="flow_Office_out" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> nfmark="101">
>      Office_out;
>    </flow>
>    <flow name="flow_Office_in" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
> nfmark="102">
>      Office_in;
>    </flow>
>  </flow>
>
>   </flow>
> </traffic>
> </firewall>
>

While definitely not qualified to speak for BWM-Tools, I highly suspect (from 
doing similar myself) that you are going to have to actually compile the 
bwm_monitor, bwmd, etc on the new OS (Centos) versus just copying it over 
from backups (if this is actually what you did).

If you compiled bwm from source on the Centos box, and simply copied your 
configs in, then something did not go right in the compile, go back and do it 
again and pay particular attention to the configure logs and the output of 
the make, make install.

-- 
Larry Smith
SysAd ECSIS.NET
sy...@ec...

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

[<pra...@gm...>]
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[bwm-tools-tech] Not shaping anymore (Where to troubleshoot)

[Andrew N. <and...@gm...>]

I had bwm-tools running in production for about 5 months. I had a
harddrive go bad in the box last night. So lucky for me I had backups.
I run my server in bridge mode so traffic continued to to flow so I
don't think I made any stupid mistakes restoreing the backup because I
was in a rush. Here is what I have found so far no shaping is occuring
for any IP's listed, bwm-monitor will not work over ssh and traffic is
for sure flowing through the bridge again.

The box is bridged and has an IP of 192.168.100.10. The clients all
connect using the 10.1.1.x subnet. The client "Office" should be
limited to about 256k both directions and total bandwidth usage should
 be about 256k.

What is wrong? What won't bwm_monitor work? bwm_montior will just sit
there when I run it no user interface appears, the only way to get
back to the console is to 'ctrl c' which causes a segmentation fault.
Where do I start to troubleshoot? It appears that everything starts
fine. I did upgrade from Fedora Core 4 to CentOS 4.3 on the new drive
but other than that everything should be identical.

My once working config is pasted below (minus some unimportant data):
<firewall>
 <global>
  <modules>
   <load name="ip_queue"/>
  </modules>

#Begin Access Classes
<class name="AllowSSH">
  <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="22"/>
</class>
<class name="AllowHTTP">
  <address dst="192.168.100.10" proto="tcp" dst-port="80"/>
</class>

#Begin Traffic Classes
<class name="Office_out">
  <address src="10.1.1.253"/>
</class>
<class name="Office_in">
  <address src="! 10.1.1.253" dst="10.1.1.253"/>
</class>
</global>

#Access Control Lists
<acl>
  <table name="filter">
   <chain name="INPUT" default="DROP">
    <rule name="allowed_traffic" target="ACCEPT">
     AllowSSH
     AllowHTTP
    </rule>
   </chain>
   <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
    <rule name="controlled_traf" target="bwmd">
     Office_in
     Office_out
    </rule>
    <rule name="disabled_traf" target="DROP">
    </rule>
   </chain>
   <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
   </chain>
  </table>
</acl>

#Traffic Flows
<traffic>
  <flow name="traffic_total" max-rate="7680000" queue-len="5"
queue-size="4500" report-timeout="60">
 <flow name="flow_Office_total" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
   <flow name="flow_Office_out" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
nfmark="101">
     Office_out;
   </flow>
   <flow name="flow_Office_in" max-rate="32000" report-timeout="60"
nfmark="102">
     Office_in;
   </flow>
 </flow>

  </flow>
</traffic>
</firewall>

[bwm-tools-tech] [Fwd: [Fwd: Re: Bandwidth management tool]]

[Prab B. <pra...@gm...>]

Dear BWM tools tech supprt,
I could get uptil configure part.

When i run make, i am getting the following error msg.
root@localhost rrdtool]# cd ..
[root@localhost bwm_tools-200603080716]# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
Making all in rrdtool
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/rrdtool'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/rrdtool'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
make: *** [all] Error 2
[root@localhost bwm_tools-200603080716]#

Pls advise.
thanks

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Bandwidth management tool
Date: 	Sun, 20 May 2007 17:39:12 -0400
From: 	Prab Balasubramanian <pra...@gm...>
Reply-To: 	pra...@gm...
To: 	Nigel Kukard <nk...@lb...>
CC: 	Munia Raja <raj...@gm...>, Suresh <lik...@gm...>, 
Gurunathan gmail <gur...@gm...>
References: 	<464...@gm...> <464...@lb...>



Nigel,

I could get uptil configure part.

When i run make, i am getting the following error msg.
root@localhost rrdtool]# cd ..
[root@localhost bwm_tools-200603080716]# make
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
Making all in rrdtool
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/rrdtool'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'.  Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716/rrdtool'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/bwm_tools-200603080716'
make: *** [all] Error 2
[root@localhost bwm_tools-200603080716]#

Pls advise.
thanks

Nigel Kukard wrote:

>Hi,
>
>  
>
>>Can you pls help us out in developing bandwidth management tool.
>>Pls reply us with your contact number or any other contact details.
>>We really need someone's help in building the tool.
>>    
>>
>Best form of support is using the mailing list described on the website.
>
>If you need more dedicated support or support contracts please let me know.
>
>  
>

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Hello

[Prashant S. <spi...@gm...>]

Hey nigel,

Thanx for ur sample file.. I really appriciate it.

By the way can you please briefly describe the installation of bwm-tools
with howto use it, coz i've been so much confused these days bout installing
and implementing bwm-tools. I've been given task to put a bandwidth
management software in our network. It will be very kind of you tht you are
spending ur time for our problems. Can you please make rpm of bwm-tools ?


I've alerady tried installing bwm-tools by bwm-tools.tar.gz with rrdtool
1.0.5.0 , but couldn't find firewall.xml file in "
/etc/bwm_tools/firewall.xml " .

I am looking forward to ur reply regarding the solution...


On 5/3/07, Nigel Kukard <nk...@lb...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > That advice I got from some of the mod of a forum called
> > Linuxquestions.org <http://Linuxquestions.org>.  But I've checked tht
> > links yesterday night and those are bandwidth monitoring tools not
> > bandwidth shaping tool.
> >
> > I am still searching for bwm-tools rpm..... I have downloaded
> > bwm-tools.tar.gz and also i've installed it , but cannot find
> > firewall.xml file as described in the tutorial.
> I'll add creating RPM's to my todo list.
>
> I've attached a sample firewall.xml file, I thought I actually included
> in the source but seems not.
>
> Kind Regards
> Nigel
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Prashant Soni
Sr. Network Engineer
Elecon Information Technology LTD.
+91-9825164844
+91-2692-231217

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Hello

[Nigel K. <nk...@lb...>]

Hi,

> That advice I got from some of the mod of a forum called
> Linuxquestions.org <http://Linuxquestions.org>.  But I've checked tht
> links yesterday night and those are bandwidth monitoring tools not
> bandwidth shaping tool.
>  
> I am still searching for bwm-tools rpm..... I have downloaded
> bwm-tools.tar.gz and also i've installed it , but cannot find
> firewall.xml file as described in the tutorial.
I'll add creating RPM's to my todo list.

I've attached a sample firewall.xml file, I thought I actually included
in the source but seems not.

Kind Regards
Nigel

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Hello

[Prashant S. <spi...@gm...>]

Hey dude,

That advice I got from some of the mod of a forum called Linuxquestions.org.
But I've checked tht links yesterday night and those are bandwidth
monitoring tools not bandwidth shaping tool.

I am still searching for bwm-tools rpm..... I have downloaded
bwm-tools.tar.gz and also i've installed it , but cannot find
firewall.xmlfile as described in the tutorial.

I am mailing you the tute link.. download it and check it and if u got any
success please mail me..


http://bwm-tools.pr.linuxrulz.org/display.php?page=documentation


On 5/3/07, Kyaw Thet Lwin <kya...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your advice, fri, but... could you please provide me the
> download link for that file.
> I tried searching in rpmfind.net, rpm.pbone.net, rpmschool.org,
> redhat.com and google.com to no avail.
>
> Thanks, again.
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> KTL
>
>
> On 5/2/07, Prashant Soni <spi...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi There,
> >
>
> >
> I am also searching the similer kinda file on net. but can't find it.
> >
>
> >
> Some of my friends told me tht they have successfully running copy of
> bwm tools of fc4 on fc6. So you can also download rpm for fc4 which
> will run on fc6.
> >
> > > > On 5/2/07, Kyaw Thet Lwin <kya...@gm...> wrote:>
> Hello friends,
> >
> >
> > I'm a newbie to bwm_tools.
> > I wonder if any of you have a .spec file for Fedora Core 6
> > ?
> >
> > If so, I would be very grateful if you could share with me.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> >
> Best Regards
> > KTL
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> >
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > bwm-tools-tech mailing list
>
> > bwm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Prashant Soni
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > Elecon Information Technology LTD.
> > +91-9825164844
> > +91-2692-231217
>
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> > _______________________________________________
> > bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> > bwm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best Regards
> KTL
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>



-- 
Regards,

Prashant Soni
Sr. Network Engineer
Elecon Information Technology LTD.
+91-9825164844
+91-2692-231217

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Hello

[Kyaw T. L. <kya...@gm...>]

Thanks for your advice, fri, but... could you please provide me the
download link for that file.
I tried searching in rpmfind.net, rpm.pbone.net, rpmschool.org,
redhat.com and google.com to no avail.

Thanks, again.


--
Best Regards
KTL


On 5/2/07, Prashant Soni <spi...@gm...> wrote:
Hi There,
>

>
I am also searching the similer kinda file on net. but can't find it.
>

>
Some of my friends told me tht they have successfully running copy of
bwm tools of fc4 on fc6. So you can also download rpm for fc4 which
will run on fc6.
>
> > > On 5/2/07, Kyaw Thet Lwin <kya...@gm...> wrote:>
Hello friends,
>
>
> I'm a newbie to bwm_tools.
> I wonder if any of you have a .spec file for Fedora Core 6
> ?
>
> If so, I would be very grateful if you could share with me.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
Best Regards
> KTL
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list

> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech

>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Prashant Soni
> Sr. Network Engineer
> Elecon Information Technology LTD.
> +91-9825164844
> +91-2692-231217

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>
>

--
Best Regards
KTL

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Hello

[Prashant S. <spi...@gm...>]

Hi There,

I am also searching the similer kinda file on net. but can't find it.

Some of my friends told me tht they have successfully running copy of bwm
tools of fc4 on fc6. So you can also download rpm for fc4 which will run on
fc6.

On 5/2/07, Kyaw Thet Lwin <kya...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Hello friends,
>
>
> I'm a newbie to bwm_tools.
> I wonder if any of you have a .spec file for Fedora Core 6
> ?
>
> If so, I would be very grateful if you could share with me.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Best Regards
> KTL
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>



-- 
Regards,

Prashant Soni
Sr. Network Engineer
Elecon Information Technology LTD.
+91-9825164844
+91-2692-231217

[bwm-tools-tech] Hello

[Kyaw T. L. <kya...@gm...>]

Hello friends,


I'm a newbie to bwm_tools.
I wonder if any of you have a .spec file for Fedora Core 6
?

If so, I would be very grateful if you could share with me.


Thanks.

--
Best Regards
KTL

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Ubuntu and bwm_firewall

[Andrew N. <and...@gm...>]

That was it!! Thanks!

On 4/4/07, Sudip Karki <sa...@he...> wrote:
> hi @ndrew,
>   Looks like a permisson prob.
> try with a root user or r u already while firing this  bwm_firewall -l
>
> will this step works ?
>
> bwm_firewall --file=/tmp/bwmdiptables
> iptables-restore < /tmp/bwmdiptables
>
>
>
> -----------------
> Sudip Karki
>
>
>
>
> > How do I use the bwm_firewall comand on Ubuntu? When I try to do a
> > bwm_firewall -l I get an: Failed to open file
> > "/etc/sysconfig/iptables": No such file or directory which makes sense
> > since this is not a redhat box. What is the easiest way to work around
> > that?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  _
> > /-\ ndrew
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn
> > cash
> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> > _______________________________________________
> > bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> > bwm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] What is wrong with this config

[Sudip K. <sa...@he...>]

hey,
  Place this  tags in the global and the acl section respectively ,

#Inside the global tag
<chain name="FORWARD">
     <rule cmd-line="-m mark ! --mark 0x0" target="bwmd">
             bwmdfw
     </rule>
</chain>


#Inside the acl tag
<chain name="FORWARD">
    <rule cmd-line="-m mark ! --mark 0x0" target="bwmd">
                    bwmdfw
     </rule>
</chain>

Watch the packets flow of the filter table regarding the queue chain if
anything goes wrong.


--------------------
Sudip Karki


> Ok I am trying to get bwm-tools running on a CentOS 4.4 box.
>
> It has two network interfaces in a bridge:
>
> cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE=eth0
> HWADDR=00:0C:41:E2:A1:03
> ONBOOT=yes
> TYPE=Ethernet
> BRIDGE=br0
> #IPADDR=192.168.100.98
> #NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> #GATEWAY=192.168.100.1
>
> cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
> DEVICE=eth1
> HWADDR=00:D0:B7:B3:96:69
> ONBOOT=yes
> TYPE=Ethernet
> BRIDGE=br0
>
> cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0
> DEVICE=br0
> TYPE=Bridge
> IPADDR=192.168.100.98
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> ONBOOT=yes
>
> I my firewall.xml file looks like this:
> <firewall>
>         # Global configuration and access classes
>         <global>
>                 # Modules we need to load
>                 <modules>
>                         <load name="ip_queue"/>
>                 </modules>
>                 # BEGIN access classes
>                 <class name="ssh_traffic">
>                         <address dst="192.168.100.98" proto="tcp"
> dst-port="22"/>
>                 </class>
>                 <class name="http_traffic">
>                         <address dst="192.168.100.98" proto="tcp"
> dst-port="80"/>
>                 </class>
>                 # END access classes
>                 # Traffic Classes
>                 <class name="laptop_up">
>                         <address src="192.168.100.97"/>
>                 </class>
>                 <class name="laptop_down">
>                         <address src="! 192.168.100.97"
> dst="192.168.100.97"/>
>                 </class>
>         </global>
>         # Access control lists
>         <acl>
>                 <table name="filter">
>                         <chain name="INPUT" default="ACCEPT">
>                                 <rule name="allowed_traffic"
> target="ACCEPT">
>                                    http_traffic
>                                    ssh_traffic
>                                 </rule>
>                         </chain>
>                         <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
>                         </chain>
>                         <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
>                         </chain>
>                 </table>
>         </acl>
>         # Traffic flows
>         <traffic>
>                 # Allow about 256k total usage
>                 <flow name="traffic_total"  max-rate="32000"
> report-timeout="60">
>                         <flow name="flow_laptop_down" max-rate="25000"
> burst-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
>                         <queue prio="40"
> nfmark="1001">laptop_down;</queue> </flow>
>                         # Only allow 64k upload
>                         <flow name="flow_laptop_up"  max-rate="8000"
> report-timeout="60">
>                                 <queue prio="30"
> nfmark="1002">laptop_up;</queue>
>                         </flow>
>                 </flow>
>         </traffic>
> </firewall>
>
> I have ip_forwarding turned on in the CentOS box.
>
> I load the firewall like this: bwm_firewall -l
> I then start bwmd in the foreground like this: bwmd -f
> I a new terminal I start bwm_monitor and when I look at the stats for
> traffic total I don't see any packets flowing even though I am
> browsing the web with the laptop
>
>
> When I go to test I expect my laptop that has an IP of 192.168.100.97 to
> get no more than 256k of download. Speed test do not show that. What am
> I missing?
>
> If I forgot any important information I can post it.
>
> Thanks for any help in advance,
>  _
> /-\ ndrew
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn
> cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Ubuntu and bwm_firewall

[Sudip K. <sa...@he...>]

hi @ndrew,
  Looks like a permisson prob.
try with a root user or r u already while firing this  bwm_firewall -l

will this step works ?

bwm_firewall --file=/tmp/bwmdiptables
iptables-restore < /tmp/bwmdiptables



-----------------
Sudip Karki




> How do I use the bwm_firewall comand on Ubuntu? When I try to do a
> bwm_firewall -l I get an: Failed to open file
> "/etc/sysconfig/iptables": No such file or directory which makes sense
> since this is not a redhat box. What is the easiest way to work around
> that?
>
> Thanks,
>  _
> /-\ ndrew
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn
> cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Compile Error on Ubuntu 6.06

[Andrew N. <and...@gm...>]

Are all these packages installed?
apt-get install build-essential rrdtool libxml2
librrd2-dev libglib2.0-dev libxml2-dev

I got bwm-tools and installed but never got it functing. i moved to
centos and got stuff working

On 4/3/07, John Bii <jo...@mu...> wrote:
>  I am also trying to install  bwm-tools 0.2.3 on Ubuntu 6.06.
>
>
>
>  ./configure command completes with no problem.
>
> The  make command gives me the following error, what am I missing?
>
>
>
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..     -I../include -pthread
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
> -DLOG_DIR=\"/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0  -g -O2 -MT bwm_graph-graph.o -MD
> -MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c'
> || echo './'`graph.c; \
>
>         then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; else
> rm -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
>
> graph.c: In function &#8216;writeGraphs&#8217;:
>
> graph.c:637: error: too few arguments to function &#8216;rrd_graph&#8217;
>
> make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1
>
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph'
>
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/bwm_tools-200603080716'
>
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
>
> John Bii
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> John Bii
>
> School of Medicine
>
> Moi University
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> bwm-tools-tech mailing list
> bwm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bwm-tools-tech
>

Re: [bwm-tools-tech] Compile Error on Ubuntu 6.06

[John B. <jo...@mu...>]

 I am also trying to install  bwm-tools 0.2.3 on Ubuntu 6.06. 



 ./configure command completes with no problem.

The  make command gives me the following error, what am I missing?



if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..     -I../include -pthread
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include  
-DLOG_DIR=\"/var/bwm_tools\" -DRRDTOOL_VER=0  -g -O2 -MT bwm_graph-graph.o -MD
-MP -MF ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" -c -o bwm_graph-graph.o `test -f 'graph.c'
|| echo './'`graph.c; \

        then mv -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo" ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Po"; else
rm -f ".deps/bwm_graph-graph.Tpo"; exit 1; fi

graph.c: In function ‘writeGraphs’:

graph.c:637: error: too few arguments to function ‘rrd_graph’

make[2]: *** [bwm_graph-graph.o] Error 1

make[2]: Leaving directory `/opt/bwm_tools-200603080716/bwm_graph'

make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/bwm_tools-200603080716'

make: *** [all] Error 2



John Bii





-- 

John Bii

School of Medicine

Moi University

[bwm-tools-tech] What is wrong with this config

[Andrew N. <and...@gm...>]

Ok I am trying to get bwm-tools running on a CentOS 4.4 box.

It has two network interfaces in a bridge:

cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:0C:41:E2:A1:03
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
BRIDGE=br0
#IPADDR=192.168.100.98
#NETMASK=255.255.255.0
#GATEWAY=192.168.100.1

cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
DEVICE=eth1
HWADDR=00:D0:B7:B3:96:69
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
BRIDGE=br0

cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0
DEVICE=br0
TYPE=Bridge
IPADDR=192.168.100.98
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
ONBOOT=yes

I my firewall.xml file looks like this:
<firewall>
        # Global configuration and access classes
        <global>
                # Modules we need to load
                <modules>
                        <load name="ip_queue"/>
                </modules>
                # BEGIN access classes
                <class name="ssh_traffic">
                        <address dst="192.168.100.98" proto="tcp"
dst-port="22"/>
                </class>
                <class name="http_traffic">
                        <address dst="192.168.100.98" proto="tcp"
dst-port="80"/>
                </class>
                # END access classes
                # Traffic Classes
                <class name="laptop_up">
                        <address src="192.168.100.97"/>
                </class>
                <class name="laptop_down">
                        <address src="! 192.168.100.97" dst="192.168.100.97"/>
                </class>
        </global>
        # Access control lists
        <acl>
                <table name="filter">
                        <chain name="INPUT" default="ACCEPT">
                                <rule name="allowed_traffic" target="ACCEPT">
                                   http_traffic
                                   ssh_traffic
                                </rule>
                        </chain>
                        <chain name="FORWARD" default="ACCEPT">
                        </chain>
                        <chain name="OUTPUT" default="ACCEPT">
                        </chain>
                </table>
        </acl>
        # Traffic flows
        <traffic>
                # Allow about 256k total usage
                <flow name="traffic_total"  max-rate="32000"
report-timeout="60">
                        <flow name="flow_laptop_down" max-rate="25000"
burst-rate="32000" report-timeout="60">
                        <queue prio="40" nfmark="1001">laptop_down;</queue>
                        </flow>
                        # Only allow 64k upload
                        <flow name="flow_laptop_up"  max-rate="8000"
report-timeout="60">
                                <queue prio="30"
nfmark="1002">laptop_up;</queue>
                        </flow>
                </flow>
        </traffic>
</firewall>

I have ip_forwarding turned on in the CentOS box.

I load the firewall like this: bwm_firewall -l
I then start bwmd in the foreground like this: bwmd -f
I a new terminal I start bwm_monitor and when I look at the stats for
traffic total I don't see any packets flowing even though I am
browsing the web with the laptop


When I go to test I expect my laptop that has an IP of 192.168.100.97
to get no more than 256k of download. Speed test do not show that.
What am I missing?

If I forgot any important information I can post it.

Thanks for any help in advance,
 _
/-\ ndrew

[bwm-tools-tech] Ubuntu and bwm_firewall

[Andrew N. <and...@gm...>]

How do I use the bwm_firewall comand on Ubuntu? When I try to do a
bwm_firewall -l I get an: Failed to open file
"/etc/sysconfig/iptables": No such file or directory which makes sense
since this is not a redhat box. What is the easiest way to work around
that?

Thanks,
 _
/-\ ndrew