Re: [Bugzproxy-general] bugzproxy

[JP R. <jp...@no...>]

On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 11:10 +0200, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> torsdag 28 juni 2007 23:23 skrev JP Rosevear:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 21:44 +0200, Mads Bondo Dydensborg wrote:
> > > torsdag 28 juni 2007 21:07 skrev JP Rosevear:
> > > > I've been playing with this for a couple of days and have worked around
> > > > a couple of issues:
> > > > 
> > > > 1) No https handling
> > > > 
> > > > http:// is hardcoded
> > > > 
> > > > 2) No http authentication support
> > > > 
> > > > xml-rpc.net supports this
> > > 
> > > My bad - I have absolutely no experience with using bugzilla with https.
> > 
> > Patch for both attached.
> 
> Thanks. Seems good. I am a bit confused about the PreAuthenticate and 
> Credentials code - what are they for? (Just so I know why I am patching, and 
> I would like to add some docs for it. :-)

They are for http realm auth, see:
https://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.webrequest.preauthenticate.aspx

> Also, should they not be made accessible from the IServer interface, or is 
> that not needed?

Actually, given your layout it probably is a better idea to move them
there.

> In any case, I have already applied the patch, and committed to cvs. The patch 
> did not apply cleanly, because there has been some changes to support 
> bugzilla installations that are not at the root of the server, but I think 
> everything is as it should be now, but if you check out from cvs, you may 
> find that the server constructors have an argument more than they used too - 
> I hope not, though.

Ok, I diffed against 0.1.0 not the trunk so thats probably the issue.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jp...@no...>
Novell, Inc.