Re: [Bugs-r-devel] BRugs 0.4-1 with OpenBUGS 3.0.2 ready for release

[Gorjanc G. <Gre...@bf...>]

As far as I know, URL is enough.

Gregor
________________________________________
From: bug...@li... [bugs-r-devel-bounces@list=
s.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Uwe Ligges [ligges@statistik.uni-dortmund.d=
e]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:29 PM
To: bug...@li...; Dawn Woodard
Cc: Andrew Thomas
Subject: [Bugs-r-devel] BRugs 0.4-1 with OpenBUGS 3.0.2 ready for release

Hi,

I think we have BRugs_0.4-1 with OpenBUGS 3.0.2 ready for release now,
except that Andrew is going to remove libtaucs.* and make new dll / so
files available. I'll wait until that happens and release shortly
thereafter, given there are no objections.

Note that
  - you need to include OpenBUGS 3.0.2.
  - I will omit the sources as stated in
       BRugs/inst/README-inst_OpenBUGS
    unless anybody shouts. Does anybody know if we are really
    violating GPL? The URL of OpenBUGS is given in the
    DESCRIPTION file, hence the pointer to the sources is there.


Dawn, is this also fine for S-PLUS now?

Best,
Uwe

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bugs-r-devel mailing list
Bug...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bugs-r-devel