From: Uwe L. <li...@st...> - 2007-07-24 17:19:26
|
Dawn Woodard wrote: > > > It looks like the recent change that we made in how thinning is handled > in R2WinBUGS can cause a slow-down. If you run the schools example with > n.iter = 400000, n.thin = 40, n.chains = 1, the old version runs quickly > and the new version takes much longer. Perhaps we should go back to the > previous code? I apologize for introducing this bug. The reason why we > made the change was so that when the mcmc.list object is read into > R/S-PLUS using read.bugs, the thinning attribute is correct. I don’t > know whether there is another way to accomplish this. I'm fine with going back. Are there any ideas by others how to fix it really properly? Dawn, I am just working on the BRugs stuff you sent me and I think we I'll move it to the repository tomorrow, just a few improvements for R from my side. Additionally, I think we can put OpenBUGS to Sourceforge as well. Andrew told me that just "a few" files are required to be included. Best, Uwe > > > Thank you! > > Dawn > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Bugs-r-devel mailing list > Bug...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bugs-r-devel |