RE: [btech-discussion] Note about modifying hudinfo

[Tuncay G. <tgo...@ma...>]

Hi T,

Normally, you would be right. However, the only current client that uses
hudinfo is your thud. Yes, I'm working on hudinfo for my client, and
yes, I'll have to modify hudinfo t parsing, but my clients hudinof
implementation is far from complete (and currently unreleased) anyway.

Is there there any other client that I dont know of ?

Regards,
---
Tuncay G=F6nc=FCo=F0lu
Senior Developer

tgo...@ma...
GSM:+90-532-6176445
Fax:+90-533-9830363



> -----Original Message-----
> From: bte...@li...=20
> [mailto:bte...@li...] On=20
> Behalf Of Anthony Parker
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:03 AM
> To: bte...@li...
> Subject: [btech-discussion] Note about modifying hudinfo
>=20
>=20
> Just so everyone's clear on some things, we should /really/=20
> avoid modifying
> hudinfo so that it breaks current clients. It's easy enough to update
> current code, sure, but as it gets more popular, there are=20
> people out there
> using older versions of HUDs that will probably have to stop=20
> working because
> of a change in the core format of commands like 'hudinfo t'.
>=20
> - Tony
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=3Dsourceforge1&refcode1=3Dvs3390
> _______________________________________________
> btech-discussion mailing list
> bte...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/btech-discussion
>=20
>=20
>=20