From: Daniel Roßberg <danielmrossberg@gm...> - 2013-09-03 14:39:52
2013/9/1 Vlad Bogolin <vladbogolin@...>:
> Finally, I tried to see how a framebuffer window should be embedded. The
> first problem that comes in mind is the framebuffer: which one should I use?
> I saw that creating a new Qt framebuffer was another GSoC proposed idea so
> the ideal solution (a Qt framebuffer) cannot be used at this moment. So the
> option that remain are to use a different framebuffer or to start
> implementing the Qt framebuffer. As it comes to the second solution I would
> like to start implementing and continue working at this section after GSoC,
> but I'm not sure how much will I progress until the end of the GSoC. What do
> you think?
You should first harden the frame buffer opening functions for
non-existent interfaces (as you already did locally in your sources).
Then I would like to see you implementing a Qt frame buffer. This
clearly goes beyond the scope of your project and I would welcome if
you stay joined after GSoC and contribute further to BRL-CAD. Perhaps
you can implement a Qt frame buffer interface with mostly dummy
functions until GSoC ends.
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.