From: <er...@he...> - 2004-09-17 17:16:02
|
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 07:59:46PM +0100, Miguel Dias Costa wrote: > Hello all > > does bjs set a stack ulimit to 8192? > > We verify that bpsh migrates ulimits to the nodes but with bjssub, there > is always this stack limit. bjs doesn't do anything with ulimits. If you're running in batch mode, you'll probably get whatever bjs itself gets. In interactive mode, your job will get whatever you've got in your shell. bjs really should deal with the ulimits. I was thinking that bjs should actually get PAM in the loop when starting jobs so that things like pam_limits can work too. - Erik |