From: <er...@he...> - 2004-08-20 16:50:51
|
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:04:07PM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:08:37PM -0400, Adrian Thiele wrote: > > I use a /28 on mine, and have not experienced any problems. But I also > > specify my netmasks. > > Well, that patch was really about that that a clustermatic startup > file ignores your netmask specification and a way to fix that > without relying on utilities which are present only on some > installations. I think it only crops up with IP multicast and broadcast situations. The script should definitely get it right. > > Leaving networking config to the OS means less changes are needed > > for things like ipv6. I do however, see your point and concern > > for correct configuration of the nodes. I've checked in Michal's patch to do the ip + netmask -> broadcast address correctly. I also modified it so that having the IP and netmask at all is now optional. If you do use it, it burps out a little message stating that using the clustermatic config to set IP addresses is deprecated. I think it should be removed at some point. > > Slightly different topic 2.6.8.1 looks to be fairly sane . I > > haven`t been able to use 2.6 until now, for a variety of non > > Bproc issues, mostly the ips driver. 2.6.8.1 built very clean > > for me yesterday. I`ll try it with Bproc today. > > I tried that with bproc-4.0.0pre6 a few days ago. A kernel patch > needed some adjustments. No idea yet how different that is from > what is now in CVS. A node came up without any fuss and looked ok > but bpsh got an indigestion. A filp_open() call errored out. > I cannot tell much more at the moment. I have a 2.6.8 patch in CVS at this point. So far it looks functional to me. - Erik |