Re: [BProc] Re: More LAM / BProc changes (fwd)

[Thomas E. <eck...@gm...>]

On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Brian Barrett wrote:

(...)
> Luke was using BProc 4, which LAM 7.0.x does not support (LAM 7.1, 
> which just went into beta, supports what is currently in the BProc 4 
> API.  Hopefully, that means it will support BProc 4 when it goes 
> stable).

for the records: the snapshot lam-7.1a1r9708 seems to work fine with
bproc-4.0.0_pre5 (with a small additional patch from this list) on ia32 and
x86_64 (mpirun'ing jobs works).
If I can help with some testing please let me know.

> If you have any problems using LAM 7.0.x with BProc 3, please let us 
> (the LAM developers) know.  There has been some fairly extensive 
> testing, so I would be surprised if there were problems in that area.

Up to now I've only tested the snapshot -- lam-7.0.x with bproc3 is on my
todo-list (which may be obsoleted by newer releases ;).

Thanks for your reply,
Thomas

-- 
   "Someday I'll write my own philosophy book." -Calvin