Re: [BProc] Re: More LAM / BProc changes (fwd)

[Brian B. <brb...@la...>]

On Jul 20, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Thomas Eckert wrote:

> this thread seems to have slipped off the bproc-list -- most likely I 
> replied
> to the wrong message -- so here is a forward of my reply :(
>
> I'm interested in the bproc3<->lam-7.0.x results: have you tried 
> bproc3 with
> the latest stable lam (7.0.x) and it did not work or are you focusing 
> on
> bproc4 now anyway due to other reasons (want to use 2.6-kernels, ...)?

Luke was using BProc 4, which LAM 7.0.x does not support (LAM 7.1, 
which just went into beta, supports what is currently in the BProc 4 
API.  Hopefully, that means it will support BProc 4 when it goes 
stable).

If you have any problems using LAM 7.0.x with BProc 3, please let us 
(the LAM developers) know.  There has been some fairly extensive 
testing, so I would be surprised if there were problems in that area.


Brian

-- 
   Brian Barrett
   LAM/MPI developer and all around nice guy
   Have a LAM/MPI day: http://www.lam-mpi.org/