[BProc] Re: More LAM/BProc changes

[Daniel G. <dg...@ti...>]

Hi Brian,

The latest version in SVN (as of yesterday evening) seems to work fine!
I can lamboot, and then mpirun a process compiled with mpif77, and all
that jazz...

The master is still assigned as n0, but I didn't notice whether the 
actual mpi code is running on the master or not (the job I tested was
too quick.  When the job starts it prints:

racaille:dgruner{132}> mpirun -np 4 ./fpi
 Process            1  of            4  is alive
 Process            0  of            4  is alive
 Process            2  of            4  is alive
 Process            3  of            4  is alive

and lamboot produced the output in the attached file.  It looks ok to
me, but I want to make sure that the mpi jobs are NOT run on the master.

Regards,
Daniel


On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:57:26PM -0700, Brian W. Barrett wrote:
> Hey all -
> 
> I think I finally fixed things so LAM really does avoid the 
> bproc_nodeinfo() call on BProc 4 clusters.  Changes should be in SVN.  
> Let mw know if you have any problems.  I think this leaves us with 
> Luke's master node being identified as n0 problem as the one remaining 
> bug.  Still not sure why Luke would see that and Daniel wouldn't.  
> *shrug*.
> 
> Brian
> 
> -- 
>    Brian Barrett
>    LAM/MPI developer and all around nice guy
>    Have a LAM/MPI day: http://www.lam-mpi.org/

-- 

Dr. Daniel Gruner                        dg...@ti...
Dept. of Chemistry                       dan...@ut...
University of Toronto                    phone:  (416)-978-8689
80 St. George Street                     fax:    (416)-978-5325
Toronto, ON  M5S 3H6, Canada             finger for PGP public key