Re: [BProc] Re: More LAM / BProc changes

[Luke P. <lo...@du...>]

> Unfortunately not.  I assume you are using the autoconf way of building
> the packages, right?

I don't see any autoconf stuff in there...

> Have you tried to use the stock clustermatic 4?  Why would you absolutely
> need a newer kernel?

Well, the primary motivation is that I need to do some non-standard
networking stuff in my kernels.  However, a newer motivation is that
Brian, Dan, and I have discovered some brokenness in bproc_nodeinfo and
I was wanting to look into it.  

I tried the pre3 version and alas, it doesn't compile either.  Closer,
though.  I get stuff like this:

/usr/src/linux-2.4.22-cm36/include/linux/kernel.h:60:31: invalid suffix
"d5eeb25" on integer constant

...which is a result of #defines in ksyms.ver, I think.  I remember
running into this a while back, but the solution eludes me.  Anyone?

By the way, there is a working-ish version of LAM-MPI for bproc in their
SVN tree, as of last night.  Brian rules...

-Luke