Re: [BProc] Fedora Core 2 (2.6.5), bproc-4.0.0pre4 and lam-7.1a1r9667

[Daniel G. <dg...@ti...>]

Luke,

I have seen the same error messages as you.  However, LAM works just fine
with BProc 3.x, including the localhost.  As to why it actually needs it...
that is another question :-)  I guess it needs to know who starts the
processes on the nodes...

Daniel

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 04:10:34PM -0500, Luke Palmer wrote:
> The lamboot problem is because the local_bproc_resolve function doesn't
> know how to handle localhost.  So, I removed it from my bhosts file and
> tried it, but encountered another error-
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The boot SSI bproc module found that your local host is not in the
> hostfile "./bhost".
>  
> The local host name *must* be in the list of hosts in the hostfile.
> In other words, you must boot LAM from a node that will be part of the
> universe.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm not sure I understand why this is a requirement.  It certainly isn't
> with the RSH version of LAM.  Can anyone explain?
> 
> Thanks
> -Luke
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
> >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
> one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
> evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
> _______________________________________________
> BProc-users mailing list
> BPr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bproc-users

-- 

Dr. Daniel Gruner                        dg...@ti...
Dept. of Chemistry                       dan...@ut...
University of Toronto                    phone:  (416)-978-8689
80 St. George Street                     fax:    (416)-978-5325
Toronto, ON  M5S 3H6, Canada             finger for PGP public key