From: Greg W. <g.w...@co...> - 2004-02-23 21:36:55
|
Could be, if PVM was trying to run a script... Greg On 23/02/2004, at 2:24 PM, Dale Harris wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:22:47AM -0700, er...@he... elucidated: >> >> Hehe. You've discovered the wacky shell script hack that I put in a >> while ago. The problem with shell scripts is that then the kernel >> sees '#!/bin/sh' in a script called X it actually does >> execve("/bin/sh", "X", 0). X isn't going to exist on the nodes most >> of the time. This is true in my world anyway. BProc, in an attempt >> to be tricky and get around this, puts the script in the process's >> memory space and then gives you this file descriptor on fd 3 that >> magically just reads the file from your own memory space. This made a >> few perl users very happy a while ago. >> > > I wonder if that is what was getting in the way of PVM on 4.0? That > was > the file it would complain about. > > > -- > Dale Harris > ro...@ma... > /.-) > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > BProc-users mailing list > BPr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bproc-users > |