From: <er...@he...> - 2003-12-17 19:52:44
|
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:33:33AM -0600, William Hachfeld wrote: > > Erik, > > On a related note... How many of the /proc<pid>/ entries are "virtualized" > by bproc currently? In particular I'm interested in: > > /proc/<pid>/cmdline > /proc/<pid>/environ > /proc/<pid>/exe > /proc/<pid>/maps > /proc/<pid>/mem > /proc/<pid>/stat > > We've already established that /proc/<pid>/exe isn't supported yet. And my > current work with Dyninst leads me to believe that /proc/<pid>/maps isn't > supported yet either. How about the rest? The rule of thumb here is that if it accesses the process's memory, it isn't supported for remote procseses. Affects: cmdline environ exe maps mem statm stat and status are partly supported. The stuff like pid, comm, state and times are updated from the remote process - although in a somewhat lazy fashion. Stuff like signal handler state isn't mirrored fromt he remote binary. Neither are any of the memory stats. - Erik |