From: Nicholas H. <he...@se...> - 2003-10-17 14:40:45
|
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 19:01, er...@he... wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:23:05PM -0400, Nicholas Henke wrote: > > Any ideas on how hard it would be to add access control lists to nodes? > > We are getting pretty hard pressure here to support multiple users per > > node. I would be doing the coding, just looking for ideas and a sanity > > check. > > Here's my plan on that one: > > 1: Wait till I port to 2.6 > > 2: Then use all the existing POSIX ACL stuff. This should be trivial > at that point since "bpfs" (the node file system in BProc 4.0.0pre1) > already has support for arbitrary extended file attributes. > > Until then, the UNIX file system-like semantics are pretty limiting > for that case and it won't be easy to fix. > > It might be fairly easy to skip straight to step 2 (on BProc 4, not > 3.2.6) since there are some ACL patches for Linux 2.4. I haven't > tried that so I have no idea what the feasibility of that will be. I looked at the info available on the ACL support for 2.4, and it looks fairly sane. From what I can see, those are the same patches that the Lustre folks are also using. Once I get 4.0pre up on struggles, I am going to look at the bpfs stuff to see what it would take to get this done. I hope to have a better idea in a few weeks :) Thanks for the info ~ Nic -- Nicholas Henke Penguin Herder & Linux Cluster System Programmer Liniac Project - Univ. of Pennsylvania |