RES: [BProc] Beoboot troubles

[<ll...@st...>]

	Wilton and All,

	I find that I discovered the problem in the beoboot fase 2 image, I
did not generate it with the correct commands, then I go to test a =
little
more.  However appeared another one doubts, is that in the package =
cmtools
has two patches for the MPICH, which of the two I applies?  e in which
order? =20

	Another problem is when I compel beoboot.  An error happens that I
do not obtain to arrange of form some: =20

(cat config.boot.in;  /mkpcitable </usr/share/hwdata/pcitable) > =
config.boot
Split Loop, < STDIN > line 10.  make: * * *  [ config.boot ] Error 255

	Others two errors I arranged of the following form: =20

	In line 5 of the Makefile I modified it to:  VERSION:=3D"lanl.1.3"

	In line 76 of node_up/ethreads.c it to:  //#undef errno

	Despite the error solved when typing Make the compilation it does
not finish again successfully and I obtain to install beoboot.

	Thanks a lot

	Luiz Ot=E1vio

----------------- Original Message ------------------

	Wilton and All,

	Eu acho que descobri o problema na imagem, =E9 que eu n=E3o gerei ela
com os comandos corretos, ent=E3o vou testar um pouco mais. Entretanto =
surgiu
outra duvida, =E9 que no pacote cmtools tem dois patches para o MPICH, =
qual
dos dois eu aplico? e em qual ordem?

	Outro problema =E9 quando compilo o beoboot. Acontece um erro que =
n=E3o
consigo arrumar de forma alguma:

	(cat config.boot.in ; ./mkpcitable < /usr/share/hwdata/pcitable) >
config.boot
	Split loop, <STDIN> line 10.
	make:*** [config.boot] Error 255

	Outros dois erros eu arrumei da seguinte forma:

	Na linha 5 do Makefile alterei para: VERSION:=3D"lanl.1.3"

	Na linha 76 do node_up/ethreads.c para: //#undef errno

	Apesar do erro n=E3o solucionado ao digitar Make novamente a
compila=E7=E3o termina com sucesso e consigo instalar o beoboot.

	Muito obrigado,

	Luiz Ot=E1vio

-----Mensagem original-----
De: Wilton Wong [mailto:ww...@ha...]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 30 de outubro de 2002 03:55 pm
Para: Luiz Otavio de Lima Rodrigues
Cc: 'bpr...@li...'
Assunto: Re: [BProc] Beoboot troubles



On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Luiz Otavio de Lima Rodrigues wrote:

What exactly is the error is is returning when it doesn't load
/var/beowulf/boot.img ?

> 	Another one doubts is in relation to the access, in diverse
> applications is used rsh to have access in the slaves, however these
images

rsh is not used.. it is replaced by a similar command called bpsh, I =
also
belive there is an enhanced version of lam-mpi that was done by =
clubmask
http://clubmask.sourceforge.net, I personally haven't looked at it yet =
so
I'm
not sure what has been done.
=20
> "Beoboot no longer requires a modified C library.  The dynamic linker
patch
> was only for demand loading of libraries which we're trying to get =
away
> from."=20

You can continue using the libs you are using now, it should not affect
anything, the only difference between stock glibc and the bproc (3.1) =
glibc
is
that the loader was modified to request libraries from the master node =
if it
is
not found locally.

- Wilton

 ----[   Wilton William Wong
]---------------------------------------------
   11060-166 Avenue         Ph : 01-780-456-9771       High Performance =
UNIX
   Edmonton, Alberta        FAX: 01-780-456-9772        and Linux =
Solutions
   T5X 1Y3, Canada                   URL: http://www.harddata.com
 -------------------------------------------------------[ Hard Data =
Ltd.
]----