From: <er...@he...> - 2002-10-23 19:51:04
|
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:17:57PM -0400, Nicholas Henke wrote: > On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:32:42 -0400 > er...@he... wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 10:06:44AM -0400, Nicholas Henke wrote: > > > Hrm -- I seems to be breaking things again. The following oops > > > occurred running my 'noop' script again -- the ps script is that > > > script, just remove the bpsh $node ps line. I have seen this oops > > > twice so far -- the Code: was the same in both. If the trace is > > > bogus, I would _really_ appreciate any pointers you could give me to > > > get better traces for you. > > > > Ok, here we go again. I saw an oops. It might be the oops you saw. > > I think the odds are decent that it's the same one. I fixed it (I > > think) and the slave nodes that were crashing with your script don't > > seem to be crashing anymore. So give this one a whirl and let me know > > how it goes. > > > > You can either try the patch (for kernel/slave.c) included in this > > email (in addition to all the other ones). Or just grab BProc 3.2.2 > > which I just threw up on SourceForge. Oh, and I fixed that silly > > VERSION:= build problem. > > Sounds good -- btw, do you have any updated docs for the bproc_* C api? > I am working on a python wrapper for the newer calls. I'm afraid not. Feel free to ask questions if the examples in things like bpsh and mpirun are insufficient. - Erik |