[BProc] Re: bpsh bug (fwd)

[Nicholas H. <he...@se...>]

Hey Erik --
	Here is a report from our sysadmin. Anything I can do to help
track this one down?

Nic

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:31:25 -0500
From: Daniel Widyono <wi...@ci...>
To: Nicholas Henke <he...@se...>
Cc: Daniel Widyono <wi...@ci...>
Subject: Re: bpsh bug

Just rebooted all clients, diagnose -n now reports all 64 idle.  bpstat shows
all 64 up.  Here is some sample output:

[root@admin root]# bpsh -a echo hi|wc -l
     45
[root@admin root]# bpsh -a echo hi|wc -l
     64
[root@admin root]# bpsh -a echo hi|wc -l
     64
[root@admin root]# bpsh -a echo hi|wc -l
     44

bpsh -a hostname yielded 44 replies once: I get node0 through node42 in
order, then node63.  By the way, bpsh -a hostname when showing all nodes,
shows nodes 43 through 63 out of order.  Wacky?  Did those hosts get inserted
into the database incorrectly, get their IP addresses in the wrong order, or
something?

Dan W.

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:34:32PM -0500, Nicholas Henke wrote:
> Could you redirect the output to a file and send it to me so that I could
> send it to Erik as a bug report.

-- 
-- Daniel Widyono                      http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~widyono
-- Linux Cluster Group,   CIS Dept.,  SEAS,   University of Pennsylvania
-- Mail: Rm 556, CIS Dept   200 S 33rd St         Philadelphia, PA 19104