Re: [Bpmscript-users] user admin

[qxcfg <hc...@ya...>]

Great! thanks.
While I am at this, may I post another question. I was reading source code
from cvs and down there in processExecutor, in the getScopeCached method,
the scope seems to be cached with process id rather than process instance
id. Does this mean that you can only have one process instance running at
the same time? otherwise how do you prevent the multiple instances from
using the same scope and polluting it? or is this something the Rhino does
internally?

Thanks.


dkfn wrote:
> 
> Ah, that's an outstanding defect, i.e. limiting the outstanding tasks to a
> particular user or role. I'll prioritise that for an upcoming release.
> That and more documentation on it.
> 
> cheers,
> j.
> 
> 
> qxcfg wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks. Are the user(or role) concept integrated with the worklist and
>> task management? it does not seem that setting the role for a task affect
>> who gets the task. Again, some document on this would be greatly
>> appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> dkfn wrote:
>>> 
>>> BpmScript uses Acegi for it's user management. Currently it just points
>>> to an inmemory set of user names and passwords set up in the spring
>>> applicationContext. You should be able to configure it to point to most
>>> security stores by changing that config.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> qxcfg wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> How are user/role managed in BPMScript (is there a web console for
>>>> this) Also how do  the javascript tasks calls get converted to the task
>>>> web forms? Is there documentation for these. Thanks.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/user-admin-tf2124322.html#a6108064
Sent from the BpmScript - Users forum at Nabble.com.