Thread: RE: [Bojangles-devel] XML Gzipping
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
nehresma
From: Rupp, J. <Jon_Rupp@TAYLORU.EDU> - 2002-08-21 15:38:26
|
Wes and Nate, > > Do we want to include on-the-fly gzipping (and ungzipping=20 > when we get > > opening functionality)? I don't think this will have a=20 > major impact on the > > sizes of generated files but it would be interesting to=20 > implement...=20 Actually it will have a major impact.... $ ls -al kardia.* -rw-rw-r-- 1 centrall centrall 25692 Aug 21 10:35 kardia.app -rw-rw-r-- 1 centrall centrall 3797 Aug 21 10:35 kardia.app.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 centrall centrall 42110 Aug 21 10:35 kardia.xml -rw-rw-r-- 1 centrall centrall 4599 Aug 21 10:35 kardia.xml.gz > I guess > > another advantage would be for posting the XML to=20 > centrallix via the web. As nate pointed out, it would be a PUT, not POST, but this would = _really_ be cool... Especially once we can open from it too... Of course, the other option is to impliment BDQS ;) > Yeah, on the fly gzipping would be cool to have as an option at save=20 > time, and autodetected at open. yeah, especially with 42k applications :) > > Also, what is the URL to get the source of a displayed=20 > kardia app? That would be: http://server:port/kardia/kardia.app?ls__type=3Dtext%2fplain (or if = there's a chance it could be gzipped, application%2foctet-stream might = be more appropriate) However, this wouldn't be too useful on a .app file (unless you write = that converter into bojangles :), but would on a .xml one... Jonathan |