|
From: Joe Z. <jz...@co...> - 2004-04-25 22:03:02
|
Rene Rask wrote: > >X should be the number of backup runs. >Example: Backups run on monday,tuesday,and wednesday. >I have chosen to keep 20 incremental backups. 20/3 is 6.6 times one week >(7 days) which gives 46.6 days to keep backups and we round the number >up to 47 to be safe. > >20/3 is the number of weeks >times 7 is the day count. > >I hope this makes sense. > > It makes mathematical sense, but it's confusing and not intuitive. I would never guess that by looking at the configuration screen. Additionally, if someone changes the days of their backups, say from 3 to 5, that shortens the retention period even though backups have only been running 3 times per week instead of 5. If we use this method, we should calculate the retention date and show that on the screen so people would know what it is. >It seems like I'm wrong here. Guess we could use the find method. But >I'd still prefer the db method. That is better if we want to do more >advanced things in the future. > > The database method is safer and more accurate because the modification date in the incremental archive could be manually changed, say if someone moved the directory or restored it from a tape backup. I'll play with the database. The 'find' method was just so easy... Cheers, Joe |