|
From: Jochen M. <ml...@om...> - 2004-01-19 10:07:31
|
Hi Rene, fine that you have come on your feet again. ;o) Although the rsync_ssh restore method uses sftp for restoring files, the > data the administrator has to enter is the same as for the rsync_ssh > backup method. > > I think it makes a little sense but I'm not religious about it. If you and > Joe both think it would make more sense to call it "sftp" and have > seperate settings for "sftp" that works for me. > > If not we can just apply it as is and change it whenever the need arises. > as long as the data is the same it makes sense to keep it this way. In my opinion, there's another obstacle at present. One could use another method for backupping and use rsync_ssh as restoring method and the data necessary will be missing. This seems to be misleading ... What do you think about it, or maybe I am on the wrong track. Cheers Jochen |