|
From: Joe Z. <jz...@co...> - 2004-01-04 20:52:08
|
Jochen Metzger wrote: >Hi Joe, > >well I had a look through the restore_rsync_ssh patch, and I had some >thoughts I wanted to share with you. >(Actually I did not get it really running) > >== >The method itself and the main implementation is great >== > >But. >1. In this patch this restore method only works in conjunction with the >backup method "rsync_ssh" > >2. It is not real rsync_ssh, but only uses the data and uses sftp >itself. > > >So there a 2 things I do think about. > >1 -> Might be misleading, because you can choose it as restore method. > also when you choose something else as > >2 -> It might be better, when it has its own data and will be pronounced > sftp as well (rather than rsync_ssh) > >Unfortunately I do not have the time at present to give it the right >go. >The question is whether to launch it this way in the release or not. > >The way it is will in my opinion lead to a lot misunderstanding and >that would be no good for the image of this masterpiece of software. > >Cheers > >Jochen > > > Are we talking about Rene's rsync_restore.patch he posted 12-29-2003? That was a pretty large patch. I need to take a long look at it and try it out before I can comment on it. Joe |