bobs-devel

Re: [Bobs-devel] Re: bobs 0.6.0 - new installation fails, previous install worked

[James W. B. <jbe...@mi...>]

For what its worth - I'll test it when you put it out.

James


-----Original Message-----
From: Jochen Metzger <j.m...@om...>
Sent: Jan 31, 2004 8:03 AM
To: bob...@li...
Subject: Re: [Bobs-devel] Re: bobs 0.6.0 - new installation fails, previous	install worked

Hi Joe,

Am Fr, 2004-01-30 um 04.39 schrieb Joe Zacky:
> Jochen Metzger wrote:
> 
> >Well actually, I did that stuff with the rsync_ssh. It is not in the
> >current release yet. It is in the current cvs though.
> >
> >So if you used the tarballs from 0.6.0 there is no rsync_ssh.
> >
> >When implementing the rsync_ssh stuff, I set it up as a second method
> >besides rsync, so that the old fashioned rsync (setting up a
> >rsync-server on the backuped side) is still working.
> >  
> >
> I'd like to put out release 0.6.1 without waiting to apply and test the 
> rsync restore patch. What do you all think?
> 
You mean, just releeasing without the rsync_restore stuff?
That would be o.k. for me. 

Cheers 
Jochen


> Joe Zacky
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Bobs-devel mailing list
> Bob...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bobs-devel
-- 
omatix internet services
omatix solutions & trainings
omatix onlineverlag

Jochen Metzger
j.m...@om...

Telefon +49(30) 78709298
Fax     +49(30) 78709296



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Bobs-devel mailing list
Bob...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bobs-devel

Re: [Bobs-devel] Re: bobs 0.6.0 - new installation fails, previous install worked

[Joe Z. <jz...@co...>]

James W. Beauchamp wrote:

>For what its worth - I'll test it when you put it out.
>
>James
>
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>Am Fr, 2004-01-30 um 04.39 schrieb Joe Zacky:
>  
>
>>Jochen Metzger wrote:
>>    
>>
>>I'd like to put out release 0.6.1 without waiting to apply and test the 
>>rsync restore patch. What do you all think?
>>
>>    
>>
>You mean, just releeasing without the rsync_restore stuff?
>That would be o.k. for me. 
>
>Cheers 
>Jochen
>  
>
>>Joe Zacky
>>    
>>
Okay, I'll plan on releasing 0.6.1 this week. I'd like all the recent 
mods easily accessible to everyone.

Joe

Re: [Bobs-devel] Re: bobs 0.6.0 - new installation fails, previous install worked

[Jochen M. | steptown.c. <j.m...@st...>]

Hi Joe,


> >>
> Okay, I'll plan on releasing 0.6.1 this week. I'd like all the recent 
> mods easily accessible to everyone.

Fine, so this will be without the rsync_ssh_restore stuff?
I think it would cause to much trouble to use, the way it
is implemented yet.

At present, it is implemented the way that it depends on 
rsync_ssh. (Because it is using the same values), but
I think it might be better, that it does not depend on 
this.

Cheers

Jochen

> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Bobs-devel mailing list
> Bob...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bobs-devel

Re: [Bobs-devel] Re: bobs 0.6.0 - new installation fails, previous install worked

[Joe Z. <jz...@co...>]

Jochen Metzger | steptown.com wrote:

>>Okay, I'll plan on releasing 0.6.1 this week. I'd like all the recent 
>>mods easily accessible to everyone.
>>    
>>
>
>Fine, so this will be without the rsync_ssh_restore stuff?
>I think it would cause to much trouble to use, the way it
>is implemented yet.
>
>At present, it is implemented the way that it depends on 
>rsync_ssh. (Because it is using the same values), but
>I think it might be better, that it does not depend on 
>this.
>
>Cheers
>
>Jochen
>  
>
Right. I will just package the current cvs into release 0.6.1. So the 
rsync_ssh will be as it currently is in cvs. Which I think means 
rsync_ssh restore is disabled for now. But that's okay cause it doesn't 
even exist in 0.6.0.

Joe

Re: [Bobs-devel] Re: bobs 0.6.0 - new installation fails, previous install worked

[Jochen M. | steptown.c. <j.m...@st...>]

Hi Joe,

Am Sa, 2004-01-31 um 23.14 schrieb Joe Zacky:
> Jochen Metzger | steptown.com wrote:
> 
> >>Okay, I'll plan on releasing 0.6.1 this week. I'd like all the recent 
> >>mods easily accessible to everyone.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Fine, so this will be without the rsync_ssh_restore stuff?
> >I think it would cause to much trouble to use, the way it
> >is implemented yet.
> >
> >At present, it is implemented the way that it depends on 
> >rsync_ssh. (Because it is using the same values), but
> >I think it might be better, that it does not depend on 
> >this.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Jochen
> >  
> >
> Right. I will just package the current cvs into release 0.6.1. So the 
> rsync_ssh will be as it currently is in cvs. Which I think means 
> rsync_ssh restore is disabled for now. But that's okay cause it doesn't 
> even exist in 0.6.0.
Good luck

Jochen