You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(8) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-05-03 00:01:43
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3711312 By: jplenhart I took a look at the nagios structure for the project - perhaps we should add an html directory. Maybe later becoming a resources directory. Overall it might be easy to mimic their structure - but I am not sure it is a good fit for a port to Java. Any direction much appreciated. As far as build - I am in the process of getting Nagios on my machine tonight - I will take a detailed look at the build. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=545812 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-05-02 16:34:38
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3710698 By: nobody Is this project structure or the build structure? It looks a project structure, config should be etc, we need to keep that since it's more common on linux distributions. Also take a look at the nagios structure for both project and build. It should model similar, and they already have it laid out for an RPM build. Which we need to provide as well. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=545812 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-05-02 16:17:20
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3710634 By: tmacc The structure looks good. I think we should further define the src dir to separate production code from test code. A typical structure is: src |--> java (productiion code) |--> test (unit tests) From there we can have a parallel package structure so test classes actually live in the same java package as production classes. This way the tests have access to non-private members of the classes they are testing. But the source files are physically separated. This makes the build (ant/maven) a bit easier. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=545812 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-05-02 14:53:14
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3710386 By: jplenhart Hi, What do you all think about the following packaging structure: blue |->src |->plugins |->docs |->config |->build |->dist |->assemblies LICENSE.txt README.txt RELEASE-NOTES-0.9.txt maven.xml pom.xml project.properties src - obviously blue source code plugins - this can serve as the area where the plugins for blue will reside (maybe have all plugins here - but you can choose which to build with) docs - documentation config - configuration files build - the build directory dist - the distributions that you build (multiple builds can reside here) assemblies - this can be where Jetty and Tomcat can reside, 3rd party options for building the distributions the rest of the files are self explanatory - except for the maven files - I think it is worth a look to be able to have the option to download plugins from a repository - if we used maven for that, may as well use it entirely. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=545812 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-05-01 13:13:02
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3708742 By: akuns Latest changes include a. Include log4j in the dist-server tag b. packaged log4j in the WAR itself. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=545812 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-05-01 13:06:15
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3708735 By: akuns Use this thread to discuss changes committed and completed with the group. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=545812 |