RE: [Blogcfc-develop] More B3 Comments
Brought to you by:
cfjedimaster
|
From: Raymond C. <jed...@mi...> - 2003-12-02 18:56:20
|
> Just so that I can discuss this intelligently: > 1) Serving up an RSS would take less (little to none) > processing by CF. > Correct? I'm not sure I understand this. Are you asking if moving to a static RSS file would have a great impact? If so, I'd say no. I don't think it takes but a few ms to generate the RSS on the fly, but of course, there is no real reason to regenerate it each time. > 2) Could we move the RSS generation to the caching code? Is > that where it needs to be? Well, I really intended the caching code to be for content. If we move to a static file, then its a moot point. > 3) Are there any file access concerns to be considered when > writing an actual RSS file to the app's root? > Well, I just assume that CF has write access to the box. I'll document it when I add the feature, although again it will be post 3.0. -ray |