RE: [Blogcfc-develop] More B3 Comments

[Raymond C. <jed...@mi...>]

> Just so that I can discuss this intelligently:
> 1) Serving up an RSS would take less (little to none) 
> processing by CF. 
> Correct?

I'm not sure I understand this. Are you asking if moving to a static RSS
file would have a great impact? If so, I'd say no. I don't think it takes
but a few ms to generate the RSS on the fly, but of course, there is no real
reason to regenerate it each time.

> 2) Could we move the RSS generation to the caching code? Is 
> that where it needs to be?

Well, I really intended the caching code to be for content. If we move to a
static file, then its a moot point.

> 3) Are there any file access concerns to be considered when 
> writing an actual RSS file to the app's root?
> 

Well, I just assume that CF has write access to the box. I'll document it
when I add the feature, although again it will be post 3.0.

-ray