You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(104) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
(19) |
Apr
|
May
(23) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(47) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-10-08 02:21:39
|
SNAKE is an authenticating key exchange algorithm I created some time ago, and is very much in the same vein as SPEKE or SRP-3, except that it is unpatented and in the public domain. Benjamin has kindly offered to host the SNAKE home page on http://www.kripto.org/snake This doesnt have much to do with Blocks other than the fact that Blocks borrowed some of the crypto and netcode from SNAKE, but I thought you guys might be interested anyway :) SNAKE can guarantee a secure network session based soley on a short password such as a single word like 'dog', 'cat' or 'secret'. This allows secure transactions without a PKI, and could even be used for things like anonymous payment schemes or the downloading on-the-fly of large private keys. To reiterate, the key length of the password is not directly relevant to security of the session. This goes against popular crypto teachings. There are no known attacks other than online guessing and that can be minimised using denial of service after a suitable number of failures. SNAKE is immune to dictionary attacks and all other offline attacks that I know of, and offers perfect forward secrecy and authentication. ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Benjamin M. B. <br...@kr...> - 2000-10-06 04:41:34
|
Hey guys, sorry about that outage. I don't even know how long it lasted for - I'm in Rochester, NY and the server is in Topsham, Maine. Alternate email addresses are as follows: tid...@su... bm...@ri... ben...@on... After Thanksgiving, I should have the server locally in the dorm room on a OC-3 connection. Which will be a) faster than the current cable modem b) Local - when it goes down, I can physically fix it, as opposed to the current system of calling my friend back in Maine. If it is down a lot, I do apologize - The cable modem service that the server is on works most of the time, but it occasionally dies. The server itself is pretty stable, after we tinkered with it for a month or two :) Again, sorry for the troubles. -Ben Brewer On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Erik Moeller wrote: > On 5 Oct 2000, at 18:37, Blat Froop wrote: > > > Im trying to email Benjamin about kripto.org > > being down, but all the mail just bounces. > > > > Does anyone have an alternaive email address > > for him? > > Nope, only br...@kr... -- if all else fails, I can provide > space for Blocks on my site (scireview.de). > > Regards, > Erik > > -- > Scientific Reviewer, Freelancer, Humanist -- Berlin/Germany > Phone: +49-30-45491008 - Web: <http://www.humanist.de/erik> > The Origins of Peace and Violence: <http://www.violence.de> > _______________________________________________ > Blocks-development mailing list > Blo...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development > |
|
From: Erik M. <mo...@sc...> - 2000-10-05 20:40:10
|
On 5 Oct 2000, at 18:37, Blat Froop wrote: > Im trying to email Benjamin about kripto.org > being down, but all the mail just bounces. > > Does anyone have an alternaive email address > for him? Nope, only br...@kr... -- if all else fails, I can provide space for Blocks on my site (scireview.de). Regards, Erik -- Scientific Reviewer, Freelancer, Humanist -- Berlin/Germany Phone: +49-30-45491008 - Web: <http://www.humanist.de/erik> The Origins of Peace and Violence: <http://www.violence.de> |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-10-05 18:37:10
|
Im trying to email Benjamin about kripto.org being down, but all the mail just bounces. Does anyone have an alternaive email address for him? thanks PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-10-04 13:53:05
|
The web page seems to be down. Ive mailed Benjamin at his kripto.org email, but kripto.org seems to be down as well? The sourceforge page is still there so I guess we're not an entry in the X-files just yet :-) ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-22 13:48:55
|
>From: cap...@su... >To: Blocks <blo...@li...> >Subject: [Blocks-development] bug or feature? >Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 01:48:10 +0200 > >When uploading files to a remote server blocks uses up huge amounts of >memory. As uploading to a remote server is as fast as uploading to the >local cache I assume it puts the files in memory first before uploading >them. Is this correct or is there an ugly memory leak in blocks? >If it's a feature I'm not sure I'm happy with it. This way it's >impossible to upload a movie or .iso . Its shouldnt use more than about 200K extra when uploading files to remote servers. There is logic to stop this. It could be a leak... I'll investigate. Remote uploading was an unplanned feature that I just thought would be fun to add in (originally it was just for testing stuff). What does everyone think about this? Can you see any major issues wit this functionality? Its implicit in being able to proxy files into cache anyway. Should it be extended? ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: <cap...@su...> - 2000-09-21 23:48:24
|
When uploading files to a remote server blocks uses up huge amounts of memory. As uploading to a remote server is as fast as uploading to the local cache I assume it puts the files in memory first before uploading them. Is this correct or is there an ugly memory leak in blocks? If it's a feature I'm not sure I'm happy with it. This way it's impossible to upload a movie or .iso . -- Casper Gielen mailto:cap...@su... -- Linux: Assimilating the Borg. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-19 14:03:19
|
The intended iminent release of V0.17 would have been better named V0.16.2 since it mainly fixes V0.16.1 bugs, but since the inclusion of long filenames was in popular demand and this violates the protocol, V0.17 it is. So, most of the comments below relate to V0.18 or later. >From: "Erik Moeller" <mo...@sc...> >To: blo...@li... >Subject: [Blocks-development] Some Thoughts on 0.17 >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 04:26:22 +0200 > >Please discuss: > > Possible Bugs in 0.16: > - I try to download file X and I get "connection not > available". OK, but shouldn't the route then be removed > from adverts.dat? It isn't. Blocks uses a very lazy method of maintaining adverts.dat that can lead to some unavailable files being listed. I think it works better than I expected tho :) adverts.dat can contain upto 100,000 adverts (~12Mb) and its stored on disk. It would be very inefficient to have to scan and modify this file everytime a node anywhere on the Blocknet disconnects. Instead Blocks maintains a 'blacklist' of bad routes in memory each with its own timestamp. All adverts matching the search pattern which are not blacklisted or are newer than the blacklist timestamp get listed. This is much more efficient. > > General Ideas: > > - Speed Requirements. Once the maximum number of nodes is > reached, every 5 minutes, the node with the lowest average > transfer speed (if transfers have occurred) is eliminated > from the connections list. > Desired effect: High speed nodes carry much data. Low > speed nodes carry little data. > (I had some other ideas for this, but this seems the most > elegant solution. It doesn't rely on user-provided data > but uses the actual real-life values as a base.) Hmmm... in a large Blocknet you would see a *lot* of disconnections being advertised. High speed nodes are only really relevant if you have a direct connection to them, and replication might mean to you dont actually get the data from source anyway. I think this idea will have to wait until we have larger Blocknets so that we can get a better idea of the effect this would have. > > Suggestions for 0.17: > > Fixes: > - 85 char limit > 128 chars should be sufficient, even I don't have longer > names than that. Don't forget that these also have to be > routed in the adverts. Fixed. New 132 limit. > - Large files still trample over small caches. Fixed. (definately this time, I nope :-) This was actually much more complex to do than I first imagined. > > New Features: > - Error Message Queue. The main window should have a button > "0 Errors". Whenever something goes wrong, the counter > is increased. When you click on it, you get a list of > the errors with a "Clear All" option. This should take > the place of the current message boxes. > Reason: Errors no longer stop the operation of the program. > Example: Download timeouts -- automatically proceeds to > the next files without asking the user for acknowledgment. Yes, this is a very good idea. I think it will appear in the near future, but as a useability feature it has a slightly lower priority than core stuff. I'd say the chances are better than 50/50 on it making it into the next release tho. > > - Bogus Routes. Sticky files get a bogus letter attached at > the end and the TTL increased by 1 before they are > advertised. Cached files don't. > Reason: Prevent my neighbours from finding out which > files I am serving directly. > Example: Search for Britney*. Result has route AB. I > don't know whether the file is cached on A and coming > from B or whether A is the true owner. Result has > route A. I know that A just caches the file. Sticky files. My thoughts on sticky files change almost daily. Certainly the completely transient cache used by Blocks is a limitation that will probably deter people from using Blocks, but on the other hand its a big part of what makes Blocks secure. Certainly, adding a bogus routing letter at all adverts for files stored locally(sticky or otherwise) seems like a good idea. We couldnt add it for every file though, or you could assume all ads with 2 chars had a bogus one on the end. Perhaps they should only be added to files which are directly uploaded rather than proxied into cache?? That sounds a bit dangerous tho. ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Erik M. <mo...@sc...> - 2000-09-19 11:43:47
|
On 18 Sep 2000, at 23:36, Blat Froop wrote: > And best of all, its already been done. Im just doing > it should be out this weekend unless anyone has a > 'must have' request that can be implemented quickly. > > I know that we havent gone very far down the path of > our long term goals, and that discussion on WoT etc > seems to have dried up a bit. I think this is due to > the time of year and the lack of available free time > for projects like this rather than a lack of interest. Great! Can you write a bit about the list of suggestions I have posted a couple of weeks ago? I have not seen a reply from you. I don't see a lack of interest either. I think we're progressing nicely. I'll try to do some coding when I get back from vacation. I expect the announcements on infoAnarchy and elsewhere to attract new people to the project. When we are confident that the BlockNet can handle thousands of users, we should notify Slashdot. Regards, Erik |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-18 23:36:23
|
Well, the intermittent crash bug of V0.16.1 was pretty nasty, so I decided that given that there were a couple of requests for long filename support I would bump everything up to V0.17. So here is a preliminary list of whats new... * Long filename support... upto 132 chars each * You can now 'upload' to remote servers as well as your own. * Routing chars are now allocated randomly, this should thwart most statistical analysis attacks. * A few major bugs fixes... fixed the memory corruption, so hopefully we will be stable again, fixed the readvertisement logic, big files really wont trample small caches now (honest :-) And best of all, its already been done. Im just doing a bit of testing and tweaking and its ready to go. So, it should be out this weekend unless anyone has a 'must have' request that can be implemented quickly. I know that we havent gone very far down the path of our long term goals, and that discussion on WoT etc seems to have dried up a bit. I think this is due to the time of year and the lack of available free time for projects like this rather than a lack of interest. ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-17 20:21:40
|
I read the following... http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2783386.html?tag=st.ne.1002.tgif.ni it tells the story of a student who gets his dorm room door kicked in by the police and his computer equipment confiscated due to him operating an FTP server full copyrighted MP3s and movies. Now, although you might ask yourself "I wonder what would have happened if he'd been running a Blocks server?", this has obviously nothing to do with Blocks because people who run Blocks servers are responsibile individuals who would never get involved in activity like this. Still, it seems obvious that the outcome of this sort of activity will result in administrative behaviour which may affect people who would like to run Blocks servers, for example blocking incoming connections, or filtering all traffic through proxy servers and firewalls. You can already run a Blocks server and connect to a Blocknet with the listening port disabled, which should allow you to run a Blocks node on networks which disallow public servers, but proxy servers would seem to pose a larger challenge. Having done some investigation, this doesnt look to be an issue. Tunnelling Blocks traffic over HTTP doesnt look like to big a challenge, though it would take some time to integrate and would be a bit bandwidth inefficient. I was considering the recent requests to allow advertisement of 'out of cache' files, so that people could advertise files in a similar fashion to FTP or Napster, but I think that although Blocks is currently a little ahead of its time and disk space is still an issue, there will be need for secure anonymous file distribution that covers the seisure of equipment. So, at this point in time, I dont intend to start adding useability features that might encourage comprimising the original design. All comments welcome :-) ttfn PG. PS yes, bugs will be fixed soon. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-15 21:49:33
|
>From: "Benjamin M. Brewer" <br...@kr...> >To: blo...@li... >Subject: [Blocks-development] Blocks mentioned in wired? >Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:35:10 -0400 (EDT) > >Sup guys, sorry I havn't been too talkative lately - been getting >accustomed to college life (frat partys). > >I think blocks is mentioned in this months print edition of wired, but I >will be able to confirm on Saturday or Monday - for now, > >http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.10/p2p_pages.html?pg=5 > >This is from the '/wired/ dir, meaning it's the printed issue. I just >found this to be neat, can anyone confirm? Doh! I'd better fix the V0.16.1 bug this weekend then, which is going to be difficult with parties Tonight, Tomorrow and Sunday. Still, beer improves programs right? :-) ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Daniel H. <dh...@em...> - 2000-09-15 20:05:22
|
Yes, a brief listing in their Peer-2-Peer article. ------Original Message------ From: blo...@li... To: blo...@li... Sent: September 15, 2000 7:56:11 PM GMT Subject: Blocks-development digest, Vol 1 #35 - 2 msgs Send Blocks-development mailing list submissions to blo...@li... To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to blo...@li... You can reach the person managing the list at blo...@li... When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Blocks-development digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Avoiding local cache (cap...@su...) 2. Blocks mentioned in wired? (Benjamin M. Brewer) --__--__-- Message: 1 From: cap...@su... Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 01:32:54 +0200 To: Blocks <blo...@li...> Subject: [Blocks-development] Avoiding local cache Is there a way to avoid the local cache? I've quite some stuff I could share but I don't have the diskspace to keep 2 copies (one normal and one uploaded into the cache). The best would be to only insert the headers and wait with inserting the real data until it is requested. -- Casper Gielen mailto:cap...@su... -- It was a user's "club", ... in the sense of the "club" being a large stick usefull for beating IBM about the head with. --__--__-- Message: 2 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 10:35:10 -0400 (EDT) From: "Benjamin M. Brewer" <br...@kr...> To: blo...@li... Subject: [Blocks-development] Blocks mentioned in wired? Sup guys, sorry I havn't been too talkative lately - been getting accustomed to college life (frat partys). I think blocks is mentioned in this months print edition of wired, but I will be able to confirm on Saturday or Monday - for now, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.10/p2p_pages.html?pg=5 This is from the '/wired/ dir, meaning it's the printed issue. I just found this to be neat, can anyone confirm? -ben --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Blocks-development mailing list Blo...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development End of Blocks-development Digest_______________________________________________ Blocks-development mailing list Blo...@li... http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development ----------------------------------------------- FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com |
|
From: Benjamin M. B. <br...@kr...> - 2000-09-15 14:28:36
|
Sup guys, sorry I havn't been too talkative lately - been getting accustomed to college life (frat partys). I think blocks is mentioned in this months print edition of wired, but I will be able to confirm on Saturday or Monday - for now, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.10/p2p_pages.html?pg=5 This is from the '/wired/ dir, meaning it's the printed issue. I just found this to be neat, can anyone confirm? -ben |
|
From: <cap...@su...> - 2000-09-14 23:33:05
|
Is there a way to avoid the local cache? I've quite some stuff I could share but I don't have the diskspace to keep 2 copies (one normal and one uploaded into the cache). The best would be to only insert the headers and wait with inserting the real data until it is requested. -- Casper Gielen mailto:cap...@su... -- It was a user's "club", ... in the sense of the "club" being a large stick usefull for beating IBM about the head with. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-13 15:06:19
|
Looks like Michael managed to catch the obscure bug that looks to be the cause of the infrequent intermittent crashing problem on all platforms. Heres what happens... When blockgui/blockd checks its network connections and one breaks for exceptional reasons, this causes a callback so that the library and GUI can remove the connection from the active list. The GUI refreshes and calls the default FLTK idle process, which I have set up to check the network connections. Round and round we go until something breaks. Its actually a little more obscure than this, but you get the idea :-) I'll investigate further and create a patch soon, or if anyone has a preference, I could up the length of filenames to 128 and release V0.17. That might give people a little more incentive to upgrade. ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Michael S. Jr. <bl...@ms...> - 2000-09-11 11:29:20
|
The server on mspencer.net is run through a VNC session anyway. I do recommend editing /usr/bin/vncserver and customizing some things -- like, comment out the -auth line somewhere around line 139...set the resolution and bit depth in lines 35 and 36 to something just less than your desktop resolution... Other than that, just type vncserver to get started. It's very easy to use, especially over a home network. --Michael Spencer bl...@ms... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Blat Froop" <pet...@ho...> To: <blo...@li...> Cc: <cap...@su...> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2000 12:45 PM Subject: Re: [Blocks-development] newbie questions > >From: cap...@su... > >To: blo...@li... > >Subject: [Blocks-development] newbie questions > >Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:45:01 +0200 > > > >Hi, I've got some questions about Blocks. FYI I run Linux. > > > >The binary package contains two files, blockgui and blockd. > >Blockgui works according to my expectations, about blockd I'm not sure. > >Where does it fit in? Is it just a text-based version of the gui-client? > >If so, how do I upload files. Or is it just a caching/routing server? > > Its just a caching/routing server daemon. If you wanted to run > your own private Blocknet you would simply run blockd and tell > people the IP/port to connect to. Your block net would be > seperate from any other Blocknets. Or, you could create a > regional connection point to an existing Blocknet by pointing > your blockd at the main connection point. It should be possible > to use this simple mechanism to design a core structure to > the Blocknet, perhaps with the predesigned interconnections > representing high speed long haul pipes. > > blockgui does everything blockd does. One day there might even > be clients apps as well :) > > >Otherwise, am I supposed to keep the gui client running to export any > >files? This would be a PITA for me as my server has no X display > >capabilities, and I reboot my clients all the time, so redirecting output > >to a non local X-server won't work either. > > Yes, the current situation is far from ideal. My recommendation > is to run blockgui in a a VNC virtual X session and just > connect to that when you want to upload/download using > vncviewer. > > You can get VNC from http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/ > or it may well be included as standard with many Linux > distributions. > > > > >Secondly, how big is the network? > >I've been connected throug mspencer.net for a couple of hours and I can't > >see anything but my own files. > > Yes, the main test network is really just there for testing, > there may well be other 'private' Blocknets out there for > distributing different types of files and media but those > wont usually get advertised very much ;) > > Blocks hasnt really been advertised enough to gain mass > support, and there is still a little confusion about what > Blocks is being targetted at. IMHO this isnt really a > problem since Blocks is still in early development and > we really dont have the resources to deal with 20,000 > screaming AOLers at the moment anyway. > > ttfn > > PG. > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Blocks-development mailing list > Blo...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-10 17:45:42
|
>From: cap...@su... >To: blo...@li... >Subject: [Blocks-development] newbie questions >Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:45:01 +0200 > >Hi, I've got some questions about Blocks. FYI I run Linux. > >The binary package contains two files, blockgui and blockd. >Blockgui works according to my expectations, about blockd I'm not sure. >Where does it fit in? Is it just a text-based version of the gui-client? >If so, how do I upload files. Or is it just a caching/routing server? Its just a caching/routing server daemon. If you wanted to run your own private Blocknet you would simply run blockd and tell people the IP/port to connect to. Your block net would be seperate from any other Blocknets. Or, you could create a regional connection point to an existing Blocknet by pointing your blockd at the main connection point. It should be possible to use this simple mechanism to design a core structure to the Blocknet, perhaps with the predesigned interconnections representing high speed long haul pipes. blockgui does everything blockd does. One day there might even be clients apps as well :) >Otherwise, am I supposed to keep the gui client running to export any >files? This would be a PITA for me as my server has no X display >capabilities, and I reboot my clients all the time, so redirecting output >to a non local X-server won't work either. Yes, the current situation is far from ideal. My recommendation is to run blockgui in a a VNC virtual X session and just connect to that when you want to upload/download using vncviewer. You can get VNC from http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/ or it may well be included as standard with many Linux distributions. > >Secondly, how big is the network? >I've been connected throug mspencer.net for a couple of hours and I can't >see anything but my own files. Yes, the main test network is really just there for testing, there may well be other 'private' Blocknets out there for distributing different types of files and media but those wont usually get advertised very much ;) Blocks hasnt really been advertised enough to gain mass support, and there is still a little confusion about what Blocks is being targetted at. IMHO this isnt really a problem since Blocks is still in early development and we really dont have the resources to deal with 20,000 screaming AOLers at the moment anyway. ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: <cap...@su...> - 2000-09-10 11:45:40
|
Hi, I've got some questions about Blocks. FYI I run Linux. The binary package contains two files, blockgui and blockd. Blockgui works according to my expectations, about blockd I'm not sure. Where does it fit in? Is it just a text-based version of the gui-client? If so, how do I upload files. Or is it just a caching/routing server? Otherwise, am I supposed to keep the gui client running to export any files? This would be a PITA for me as my server has no X display capabilities, and I reboot my clients all the time, so redirecting output to a non local X-server won't work either. Secondly, how big is the network? I've been connected throug mspencer.net for a couple of hours and I can't see anything but my own files. -- Casper Gielen mailto:cap...@su... -- It was a user's "club", ... in the sense of the "club" being a large stick usefull for beating IBM about the head with. Frank Wagner |
|
From: Benjamin M. B. <br...@kr...> - 2000-09-08 13:35:28
|
Sorry, been getting situated at college. The page was updated 5 minutes ago. :) On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Erik Moeller wrote: > On 7 Sep 2000, at 21:39, Blat Froop wrote: > > > Soon, Erik will update the web page with the V0.16.1 patch. > > I sent the files to Benjamin yesterday. > > Regards, > Erik > (currently on vacation) > _______________________________________________ > Blocks-development mailing list > Blo...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/blocks-development > |
|
From: Erik M. <mo...@sc...> - 2000-09-07 22:56:47
|
On 7 Sep 2000, at 21:39, Blat Froop wrote: > Soon, Erik will update the web page with the V0.16.1 patch. I sent the files to Benjamin yesterday. Regards, Erik (currently on vacation) |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-07 21:40:19
|
Soon, Erik will update the web page with the V0.16.1 patch. This is a minor upgrade that fixes a few annoying bugs, and a couple of enhancements. It is completely compatible with V0.16. Here is whats new... V0.16.1 update... 1) Fixed slow downloads bug introduced in V0.16 2) Fixed bug which allowed large files to trample small caches. 3) Includes patch to allow compilation on Unixware 7. Supplied by rr...@sc... 4) Servers now remember the last 10 server ads and pass the lists to new servers when they connect. This allows servers without listening ports to build up a connection list much faster. Enjoy! PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Blat F. <pet...@ho...> - 2000-09-01 19:55:41
|
>From: rr...@sc... >To: blo...@li... >Subject: [Blocks-development] Blocks for UnixWare 7 >Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:40 PDT > >Greetings Blockheads [:> > >I've recently compiled Blocks V0.16 for UnixWare 7. >I don't believe any of the fairly trivial mods will >affect compilation on any other platform. Thanks. I will apply the changes within the next couple of days and they should become part of the planned V0.16.1 patch. Im currently waiting on more info on a couple of recent Win2K crashes before the patch gets released and V0.16 formally announced, but all the other platforms havent had any problems. Guess I'll give the Win2K'ers a couple more days then simply blame M$ :-) ttfn PG. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: <rr...@sc...> - 2000-09-01 18:53:18
|
Greetings Blockheads [:>
I've recently compiled Blocks V0.16 for UnixWare 7.
I don't believe any of the fairly trivial mods will
affect compilation on any other platform.
I found i needed to modify the Makefiles and libsock/sock.h.
I made the following modifications (diff -c output):
All Makefiles (add -lnsl -lsocket to LIB):
*** Makefile.00 Wed Aug 9 10:16:56 2000
--- Makefile Fri Sep 1 11:44:54 2000
***************
*** 27,35 ****
FLAGS=-fpic
AR=ar
! # fix standard libs for Solaris
ARCH:=$(shell arch)
ifeq ($(ARCH),sun4)
LIB:=$(LIB) -lnsl -lsocket
endif
--- 27,39 ----
FLAGS=-fpic
AR=ar
! # fix standard libs for Solaris and UnixWare
ARCH:=$(shell arch)
ifeq ($(ARCH),sun4)
+ LIB:=$(LIB) -lnsl -lsocket
+ endif
+ SYST:=$(shell uname -s)
+ ifeq ($(SYST),UnixWare)
LIB:=$(LIB) -lnsl -lsocket
endif
libsock/sock.h (define socklen_t to be size_t):
*** sock.h.00 Thu Aug 3 10:08:22 2000
--- sock.h Thu Aug 31 15:39:34 2000
***************
*** 44,49 ****
--- 44,53 ----
#include <errno.h>
#endif
+ #if defined(__USLC__)
+ #define socklen_t size_t
+ #endif
+
long NET_initiate();
long NET_terminate();
long NET_service_to_port(const char *service);
I also needed to modify fltk-1.0.9/fluid/factory.cxx slightly
(pull in strings.h to get strcasecmp defined and redefine index
so it doesn't clash with what fltk does):
*** factory.cxx.00 Mon Jun 5 14:20:42 2000
--- factory.cxx Thu Aug 31 15:21:59 2000
***************
*** 35,40 ****
--- 35,44 ----
#include <FL/Fl_Group.H>
#include <FL/Fl_Menu_Item.H>
#include <string.h>
+ #if defined(__USLC__)
+ #include <strings.h>
+ #define index foo
+ #endif
#include <stdio.h>
#if defined(WIN32) || defined(__EMX__)
|
|
From: Erik M. <mo...@sc...> - 2000-08-30 02:26:29
|
Please discuss: Possible Bugs in 0.16: - I try to download file X and I get "connection not available". OK, but shouldn't the route then be removed from adverts.dat? It isn't. General Ideas: - Speed Requirements. Once the maximum number of nodes is reached, every 5 minutes, the node with the lowest average transfer speed (if transfers have occurred) is eliminated from the connections list. Desired effect: High speed nodes carry much data. Low speed nodes carry little data. (I had some other ideas for this, but this seems the most elegant solution. It doesn't rely on user-provided data but uses the actual real-life values as a base.) Suggestions for 0.17: Fixes: - 85 char limit 128 chars should be sufficient, even I don't have longer names than that. Don't forget that these also have to be routed in the adverts. - Large files still trample over small caches. New Features: - Error Message Queue. The main window should have a button "0 Errors". Whenever something goes wrong, the counter is increased. When you click on it, you get a list of the errors with a "Clear All" option. This should take the place of the current message boxes. Reason: Errors no longer stop the operation of the program. Example: Download timeouts -- automatically proceeds to the next files without asking the user for acknowledgment. - Bogus Routes. Sticky files get a bogus letter attached at the end and the TTL increased by 1 before they are advertised. Cached files don't. Reason: Prevent my neighbours from finding out which files I am serving directly. Example: Search for Britney*. Result has route AB. I don't know whether the file is cached on A and coming from B or whether A is the true owner. Result has route A. I know that A just caches the file. Regards, Erik -- Scientific Reviewer, Freelancer, Humanist -- Berlin/Germany Phone: +49-30-45491008 - Web: <http://www.humanist.de/erik> The Origins of Peace and Violence: <http://www.violence.de> |