Hello, my name is Sergio and I'm in charge of the blitz package in Fedora. Congratulations for the release of the version 0.10. I'm trying to update the package in Fedora to this latest version.
Reviewing the changes I've found contradictory information regarding the license.
In README file, we read that Blitz is released under GPL or artistic license. From reading README alone, we don't know which version of the GPL Blitz is under.
In LEGAL, we read the same information, but the files containing the text of the licenses are different.
In LICENSE, we read that Blitz is under a Perl-like "artistic license", the BSD license or Lesser GPL version 3 or later. This file contains the text of artistic license also.
COPYING contains GPLv3, COPYING.LESSER contains some more terms that added to COPYING create LGPLv3. COPYRIGHT contains BSD license.
So, I think it is the intention of you, the authors, to release Blitz under three different licenses: LGPL version 3 or later, BSD or Perl artistic license.
I recommend to update or simplify the README, LEGAL and LICENSE files to show the current licensing of the package.
And a final suggestion; please consider migrate from "artistic license" to "artistic license 2.0". It is not clear if the former is a free software license, and in any case it is not accepted as a valid license in Fedora. More details in the wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License
Log in to post a comment.