|
From: Patrice N. <mai...@pa...> - 2004-04-13 08:14:24
|
Hi,
I have been thinking a bit about how the license issue should be
handled. Specifically I thought about who actually owns BKM.
I have come up with the following proposal. This is basically a brain
storming, and not a formal proposal yet. :-)
1. The contributor of the code/icon/whatever owns the copyright
2. Contributors are tracked with the CVS module. The person who
commits the contribution into CVS is the owner of it. This
remains so even after the contributor has left the project.
3. In order to change the license of BKM, every
contributor needs to approve. To ask for approval, the
SourceForge capabilities are used
(i.e. use...@us...). If the contributor does
not give any feedback within 60 days, his/her permission is
implicitly granted.
4. The project admins will ensure that this guidelines are given to
a contributor and that he/her agrees to this conditions. Only
after this is done, will the user be added to the projects
developers.
5. This guidelines apply to the whole bkm projects at
Sourceforge. This includes at the moment pyBKM and vbBKM.
Please give me comments about this proposal. I'm very willing to
change it according to your feedback.
And I'm not sure if this would be too complicated. But I think it
gives us a pretty good balance between control and ensuring that BKM
stays free.
Regards,
Patrice
--
Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes
to the Father except through me." (The Bible, John 14:6)
|