From: Alan G. <ago...@ya...> - 2004-05-02 00:02:44
|
I don't have a problem with the code going under the GPL. I thought the problem was it wasn't actively supported. I'm all for the GPL, so putting it bcak in the tree would be great. Alan --- Roger Binns <ro...@ro...> wrote: > Alan Gonzalez wrote: > > I've got the code for a prior version. I'll send them to you directly. > > The problem with the TM520 code was that it wasn't completed/kept up > to date, and it wasn't relicensed when we moved to the GPL. The > copyright on the code is jointly mine, yours and Scott Craig. I > have Scott's permission to "do anything I want". If you agree to > your bits going under the GPL, then I can put the code back in the > tree. I won't list it as supported or allow it to be selected > until someone actually brings the code up to date. > > Roger > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Bitpim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover |