From: Michael C. <ma...@ca...> - 2004-03-15 17:33:11
|
On 3/15/04, Tom Pollard posited: > >On Mar 15, 2004, at 10:59 AM, Steven Palm wrote: >> >>An optional install, yes, but one that is marked by default on every >>installation. So, unless a user intentionally goes out of their way >>when doing the install or upgrade to make it NOT install, it will be >>there. > >If it's optional, it's optional. Running ordinary apps under MacOS X >doesn't require its presence. My understanding is that it's mainly >there to support Terminal users and Unix geeks. If it was my >company's product, I'd insist on taking this simple step to make sure >my app ran on a minimal install of the OS. Ah, if only more 'software professionals' were this professional about their work! Back when I had a software company, I could have used as many of you as I could get! >I didn't realize that. I'd also be disinclined to muck with >bundlebuilder.py unless there was some stronger reason than this. >Maybe if the issue comes up again I'll lobby the bundlebuilder >maintainer to accept this change. Just on technical grounds, it seems Dang, where were you when I was hiring? Probably still in grade school ;-) --=20 Mike Casteel ma...@ca... Seattle, WA |