From: Roger B. <ro...@ro...> - 2004-03-07 19:36:28
|
If anyone is a lawyer on this list, it would be interesting to know about this (quoted from a /. poster on inks and inkjet printers): The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)) states: "No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade or corporate name ... ." Simply put, the warrantor can not void a warranty because of the use of an aftermarket part. Furthermore the warrantor must show that an aftermarket part caused the damage in question that they wish to void the warranty over. While this act was passed to protect automotive aftermarket part manufacturers I'm guessing it could be applied to this situation. Maybe someone with Westlaw access could check. I wonder if this also applies to using BitPim with a phone? Roger |