From: Roger B. <ro...@ro...> - 2004-01-30 18:12:07
|
> Got some fields sorted out in the phonebook and the scheduler - I have committed your patch. Are you commiting to support the TM520/VX10? (The two existing contributors have gone on to other things). > I would still caution any writing at this moment although from the > look of things it should work without much trouble. I want to move the LG writing code up into com_lg. The reading code really should be moved there as well (the getphonebook method anyway). Actually see if you can get the getphonebook method in tm520 to be identical to the vx4400 one. For the writing code I think it should also be identical. However you may require sending a p_lg.pbstartsyncrequest first. > and saving > the scheduler would pretty much requires a restart as the phone seems > to memorize the indices. The plan is for the various sync pieces of code to indicate that they recommend or require a phone reboot. > Don't know how many people are still using > the TM520/VX10 but since I'm still using mine I thought this might > be useful. It will. I would rather the TM520/VX10 are well supported, or the code is removed. Having something that half almost works isn't really worthwhile for anyone. > I'm seriously thinking about writing support for 4600/5450 I would guess they would be almost identical. The code for the VX6000 should be copied and adjusted. > and the AudioVox 8900 seeing they are quite similar, Do you have details on the AudioVox sync protocol? I doubt it is the same as the LG one. Roger |