Re: [Bitpim-devel] Another little project

[Steven P. <n9...@n9...>]

On Jan 5, 2004, at 6:25 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
>>  I store the ID code as the original hex string,
>
> That is a really bad idea!  What is the difference between the
> following:

  For informational purposes only, it is not used for any 
calculations/etc... Sorry if that wasn't clear. For actual indexing of 
the values in the internal lists used to represent the objects, it is 
using pure integers. I suppose there really isn't much value to having 
this form of the ID stored, so it can go away and save a bit of memory. 
I'll make it so.

>>   Hey, I got one right! :-)   LoL
>
> Wait for a year, and then look at the code you wrote.  I always
> get embarrassed by my old code.  But hey, it even happens to Linus :-)

  Oh, I know all about this, and being my first Python code, I have NO 
DOUBT I'll wonder what I was thinking...

> Other than the keys you use should be integers throughout, epydoc 
> reported this:
>
> =======================================================
> C:\projects\bitpim\usb_ids.py
> In usb_ids.VendorList docstring (line 190):
> -------------------------------------------------------
>  L192: Error: Improper paragraph indentation.
>
> pychecker is happy.

  I'll have to read up on those checkers, I don't know anything about 
either one. ;-)

  If you find anything else that seems wrong or needs changing, let me 
know or fix it yourself depending on your mood at the time. :-)

-. ----. -.-- - -.--
Steve Palm - n9...@n9...
-. ----. -.-- - -.--