From: Chris C. <cle...@oc...> - 2003-12-30 22:53:38
|
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Roger Binns wrote: > With the 0.7 release of BitPim, the license will be changing to > the Open Source License. > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl-2.0.php > > I have contacted all the copyright holders and they have all agreed. > If anyone can see any issues, please speak up now. > > What brought this on was someone doing a BitPim0.62 for vx6000 > that stretched some provisions of the Artistic License that > BitPim was under. That wouldn't have been too big a deal except > for two problems. One is that their "bug and portability fixes" > actually introduced new bugs, How did this stretch the Artistic License? > and that their version is indistinguishable > from the real BitPim (there is a one line change in the about box > only). I am the one that ends up with the emails and support > requests so this gets to be a big problem. How does the change to OSL mitigate future similar occurrences? -- Chris Cleeland, cleeland_c @ ociweb.com, http://www.milodesigns.com/~chris Principal Software Engineer, Object Computing, Inc., +1 314 579 0066 Support Me Supporting Cancer Survivors in Ride for the Roses 2002 >>>>>>>>> Donate at http://www.milodesigns.com/donate <<<<<<<<< |